|
Printable version |
From: | Robin Benson <rob@hammerheadmedia.co.uk> |
Date: | Sun, 1 Jun 2003 10:50:40 +0100 |
Apologies for replying with a bunch of links, but they might give readers an idea as to how the nuclear energy situation has panned out in the UK (and where British Energy have been). No energy source is immune from mismanagement, and appearing to be cheap but coming back to bite you in the bum -- especially nuclear, which doesn't equate to cheap in the long term when all costs are considered. Sellafield customers in trouble http://www.bellona.no/en/energy/nuclear/sellafield/26509.html British Energy announces huge losses http://www.guardian.co.uk/nuclear/article/0,2763,858781,00.html Nuclear phase out in UK http://www.bellona.no/en/energy/nuclear/sellafield/28047.html Gaping hole in British Energy nuclear cleanup fund http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/19048/newsDate/13- Dec-2002/story.htm "spreading the pain": British Energy troubles called lesson for Point Lepreau http://www.energyprobe.org/energyprobe/ index.cfm?DSP=content&ContentID=5334 " ... Renewed public skepticism about official safety assurances is not the only thing putting the brakes on the MOX program. In the weeks before the accident, the British newspaper The Independent disclosed that workers at the British Nuclear Fuel (BNFL) MOX fuel plant at Sellafield had falsified quality control data for 22 lots of MOX pellets destined for the Takahama 3 reactor. This revelation was bad news, especially in light of the fact that a shipment of eight MOX fuel assemblies manufactured at the same plant was already on its way to the Takahama 4 reactor. If they were defective, the pellets might cause a number of problems. ... " http://www.thebulletin.org/issues/2000/ma00/ma00lyman-dolley.html Solid gold hits -- substitute "rail" for energy as required ... British Energy pleads for state bailout http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/2240233.stm Taxpayers Shoulder British Energy Burden http://216.239.37.100/search?q=cache:bf2hsxGxdzQJ:xtramsn.co.nz/ business/0,,5086- 1960679,00.html+british+nuclear+energy+trouble&hl=en&start=10&lr=lang_da %7Clang_en%7Clang_sv&ie=UTF-8 Robin On Sunday, Jun 1, 2003, at 07:41 Europe/London, Jim Insley wrote: > Hi macdunk. > Atomic power is a cheap system for stationary power > > Where did you get that idea? And would you invest in a NZ > company proposing to use nuclear power? > But the 'greed and stupidity' bit I just HAVE to agree with. > > Cheers Jim. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|