|
Printable version |
From: | "michael gore" <michgore@paradise.net.nz> |
Date: | Sun, 10 Mar 2002 12:14:39 +1300 |
Yes I wondered about that. Can you enlighten me as to whether property companies do this if the value of their buildings were to rise? It seems to me to amount to basically the same thing. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Derek" <dkw@paradise.net.nz> To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 9:23 AM Subject: Re: Re: [sharechat] ffs > Michael, > I think you've highlighted the problem of valuing > shares by the NTA alone. Also I think that about $17 m > (from memory) of the $41 m was not real profit but due > to a valuing up the forest asset due to the growth of > trees (based on current log prices). > In other words creative accounting IMHO. > Derek > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|