|
Printable version |
From: | Derek <dkw@paradise.net.nz> |
Date: | Sun, 10 Mar 2002 09:23:51 +1300 |
Michael, I think you've highlighted the problem of valuing shares by the NTA alone. Also I think that about $17 m (from memory) of the $41 m was not real profit but due to a valuing up the forest asset due to the growth of trees (based on current log prices). In other words creative accounting IMHO. Derek ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
|