|
Printable version |
From: | "andrew cottingham" <arco@adinfinitum.co.nz> |
Date: | Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:19:41 +1300 |
Gentlemen I neglected to mention the trade in STU resulted in a profit of 44% over a 53 day period, or the equivalent of 309% annualised. Andrew Cottingham And PS - I never get bored. ----- Original Message ----- From: andrew cottingham <arco@adinfinitum.co.nz> To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:51 AM Subject: Re: [sharechat] any bored chartists? > Gentlemen. > I AM A CHARTIST, and I have been trading shares successfully on the UK, US > and AUS markets since 1985. Quite frankly I cannot understand why > fundamentalists insist on slagging technical analysists.We both use > different systems to hopefully achieve the same result - a profit. Why knock > it - there is always more than one way to skin a cat. > I do not want to get involved in a long debate on who's right and who's > wrong, because no one is....We both have our own way of deciding which > shares to buy. If we are both happy with how we achieve the end result, > thats all that matters. I am happy for others to use the fundamentalist > route, as I have myself in the past, however personally I have had far more > success with TA. > Incidentally, on my chart, STU is looking increasingly like a buy, and I > have attached a WORD Doc it so that you can see the indicators. As usual - > always place a stop (around $2.35). Nothing in share trading is ever > guaranteed - even fundamentalism. > Andrew Cottingham > PS. STU is hard to chart because of low volume. Charting low volume stocks > is not easy, which is the main reason I rarely trade the NZ market. > Disc - don't own STU. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: hugh webber <hugh.webber@clear.net.nz> > To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:59 AM > Subject: Re: [sharechat] any bored chartists? > > > > I think Geoff and Chris have hit the nail on the head and Geoff's > discussion on the fundamental > > factors that influence STU's value (which may go in a different direction > from its price - but not > > in the long term) is particularly good. > > Take NZR which I used to hold a substantial amount of.....they now provide > a two monthly report to > > the market, the last one said that a substantial portion of Marsden Pt > will be shut down over the > > summer affecting profitability. > > Because of their complicated output pricing arrangement they are not > really a New Zealand share. > > The refining margin is set by reference to refining margins in East Asia > which are totally volatile > > and very competitive with an excess of capacity. This also means that > unlike an NZ company you are > > at the mercy of overseas exchange fluctuations as well. > > However apparently the horoscope charts say that NZR is on an uptrend and > therefore a momentum buy. > > It reports about 22 February and the market seems to be speculating it > will again pay a $2 fully > > imputed dividend. I hope they are right for their own sakes, my own > requirements are for more sober > > analysis and reliability. > > The international situation is of recession and falling oil demand. The > historical data for NZR > > shows incredible volatility over the years down to some very low lows. > > Maybe its an alternative to a bungy jump but good luck from here on in, > chaps. > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|