Forum Archive Index - May 2000

["Geoff Ewert" <gewert@wai.quik.co.nz>]

Certainly better than Lewis & Grant could provide.We will book you guys a
slot on celebrity deathmatch.Good to see the nzse at least fighting a bit
----- Original Message -----
From: "hyperion" <hyperion@ihug.co.nz>
To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz>
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [sharechat] TEL


> Ril,
>
>  You really must be a bitter little man,  just because you have taken bad
> losses lately doesn't give you the right to bag any share you feel!
>
> I remeber you scoffed at me for suggesting CEN was a good buy at 2.40cps.
> Seen the share price lately?
>
> Also so what if the rural community doesn't have good line maintenance.
> Most of the traffic will come from the city anyway.  Wireless technology
is
> just around the corner which I am sure TEL will offer to rural
communitites
> instead of rolling out millions of meters of expensive cable.
>
>  Bottom line is, TEL still has a monopoly and AAPT profits are up a huge %
> this year, along with their next generation cable deal with Lucent
> Technology they are in good shape!
>
> Please find a few spelling mistakes in this posting,  I know how it annoys
> you so much.
>
> Regards
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Click here for Free Video!!
> http://www.gohip.com/free_video/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: ril <ril99_99@yahoo.co.uk>
> To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz>
> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 10:25 PM
> Subject: [sharechat] TEL
>
>
> > From your herald site:
> >
> > A very important article missed by your chatters.
> >
> > TEL has a minimum $550 m required to bring lines to sub-par. We
> > financial analysts have known for quite a while that the owners (USA) of
> > TEL were foregoing maintenance and dividend stripping the company. They
> > bailed two or so years ago with their profits while hiding the fact
> > through board influence that there were horrendous back maintenance
> > provisions.
> >
> > This is similar to owners of a bank hiding bad debts in a sale ie Cap
> > Markets and BNZ.
> >
> > So now the public as usual is holding the turkey in TEL shares.
> >
> > This is why, oh simple Kiwis, you do not allow foreigners to hold your
> > key assets. Oh silly, silly Kiwis. Now you are stuck with line
> > bottlenecks while your politicians talk the knowledge economy. Once
> > again you have been taken to the cleaners.
> >
> > My sources in TEL also tell me there is a 1/4 bn dollar back maintenance
> > for un-maintained property (buildings) to come out later.
> >
> > The sheep like NZ press are swallowing TEL's excuse because they are
> > half-witted. Anyone in the industry will tell you different.
> >
> > Of course, the directors should be held to account but won't be as is
> > the way in NZ. This is what happens when your directors have B.Com's
> > instead of BE's.
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market
> investors
> > To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at
> > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market
investors
> To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at
> http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.