Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - February 2000

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] That man Watson again!


From: richard hermans <r.m.hermans@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:39:23 +1300


and robert do you give suggestive refrence ti itc???? margie

Robert Nottage wrote:
> 
> Frank,
> I read "Unlimited" today too and found that comment
> from Eric Watson extremely revealing. After all, how
> many "spare" or "shell" companies would there be on
> the NZSE right now that Mr Watson would be associated
> with? Whatever it is, it obvious that there will be a
> lot of hype and hoopla when it all happens. It is also
> quite apparent that optimum appreciation of share
> price is what Eric Watson want to achieve and if it is
> what I think it is, we could all be in for a good
> ride.
> Regards,
> 
> Robert
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
> To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at
> http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.

References

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: [sharechat] The man, Eric brendon peters
Previous by Date: Re: [sharechat] FFS richard hermans ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: [sharechat] Eric makes the news again! frank fernandez
Previous by Thread: Re: [sharechat] That man Watson again! Nick Kearney ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]