|
Printable version |
From: | "Woody" <solarmax@optusnet.com.au> |
Date: | Fri, 6 Feb 2004 23:30:59 +1000 |
Snoopy When are you going to give the TA Traders the Respect they all deserve. Phaedrus kicked your butt on that call, admit it for once. Anyway I have yet to find a fundamental trader willing to take me on with the Forex. I have laid out this challenge many times yet not one FA Trader has come forward to take up the challenge. So here it is again: I challenge any FA Trader to trade the Euro/Usd Swap or the Usd/Jpy swap using Fundamentals only over a period of 6 Months. I will trade it using TA Only: Any Takers??? Woody Great Chart Phaedrus I often use 5/15/30 Harmonic MA ----- Original Message ----- From: <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 9:30 AM Subject: Re: [sharechat] TLS > Hi Phaedrus, > > > > > Snoopy, > >You say "It is actually a low risk strategy buying something > > that you have figured out with your F/A is cheap no matter what > > the trend is doing." > > I fear you have learnt nothing from your experience with TLS! > > > > > >http://www.sharechat.co.nz/archives/2001/06/msg00370.shtml > >http://www.sharechat.co.nz/archives/2001/06/msg00406.shtml > >http://www.sharechat.co.nz/archives/2001/06/msg00411.shtml > > > > Ah Phaedrus! You have the memory of an elephant! I must say that I > enjoyed rereading that little exchange from the archives. > Congratulations on your two successful Telstra trades. I wonder what > happened to our old mate Peter Maiden? His posts were usually good > reading. I hope his reliance on charts did not turn him into a dot com > victim! > > > > >In 2001 > >when TLS was still in a clear downtrend you were using the same > >fundamentalist arguments to advocate it as a hold or buy, saying "3 > >years down the track I would think potential shareholders would be > >very well rewarded if they bought at these levels." Quite the > >reverse, I am afraid. > > > > Cut me some slack Phaedrus. My years have twelve months in them. > Still four months to go ;-) ! > > But let's not leave half the story out either. I refer of course to the > dividends! > > 26 Oct 2001: 11cps > 29 Apr 2002: 11cps > 28 Oct 2002: 11cps > 30 Apr 2003: 15cps > 31 Oct 2003: 12cps > 30 Apr 2004: 12cps (hopefully?) > > Total 72cps > > > > >Three years ago, on the basis of the fundamentals, > > you couldn't see TLS "going as low as $5.60" (It fell > > to $3.96) > > > > Yes. I also didn't forsee the full impact of the folly of investing in Pacific > Century Cyber Works in Hong Kong. This may come as a shock to > you Phaedrus, but I do not foresee everything! I make the best calls I > can at the time. That's all. > > The objective is not to stop making mistakes (as we all make them, both > as investors and comnpany management). The objective is to make > sure you learn from the experience. Telstra have learned from their > mistake and are unwinding their growth investment strategy in Asia. > The share price performance in the future will probably change because > of that. However, I notice, Phaedrus, that your 2004 share chart for TLS > goes back and includes the prevailing sentiment from the dot com era. > > How long before Telstra makes a bolt for the next resistance level of > $A7.40? How useful is this 'historic' section of your chart? > > > > >As I said back then "Your devotion to this stock (because > >of its good fundamentals) has cost you nearly 40% in 18 months." > > > > True, but since then I am only down another 10%. Or if I include > dividends I am actually *up* on a cash basis. Just because a share > plunges 40% in 18 months, that doesn't mean you should automatically > sell it today. You have to evaluate the expected investment > performance going *forward* to make that kind of investment decision. > > Now I freely admit I haven't been 'well rewarded' over the period from > June 2001 up until now by holding TLS. But it hasn't been a disaster > either. I am still wearing the same shirt as I was when I wrote that > earlier post in 2001, while there are plenty of 'dot com' bare chested > individuals around. I suppose I could 'sell' my TLS shares now, and > stick the money in the bank. But then I would be earning less than I am > currently receiving in dividends. And I think the forecast performance of > Telstra going forward looks good. > > SNOOPY > > discl: hold TLS > > > -- > Message sent by Snoopy > on Pegasus Mail version 4.02 > ---------------------------------- > "Q: If you call a dog tail a leg, how many legs does a dog have?" > "A: Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg." > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
References
|