|
Printable version |
From: | Stephen Judd <sljudd@paradise.net.nz> |
Date: | Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:50:34 +1200 |
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 23:20, tennyson@caverock.net.nz wrote: > On the minus side that portfolio looks a little skewed towards the retail > sector with MHI, WHS and WRI, even if WRI is really 'industrial retail' > and in a slightly different category. I hadn't considered WRI as a retail share - I was thinking of them as being "agriculture", with a dash of finance. I can see what you mean though. > On the plus side you should have > picked up all of those at quite good prices, which is probably the most > important ingredient in successful investing. Heh. Yes. BCA has been the best of all, of course. > Actually it is often the other way around. Those with little capital > jump into trading as a way to make it big fast. Unfortunately trading is > not an easy discipline to master. There are a few people who make > their living from trading that participate here. But generally these are > the ones that have put in years of study into trading and risk > management. Those who buy a computer program and try to get rich > quick seem to last only a few months at best, if the rate of churn of > posters is anything to go by. I am a programmer, and I work for a bank. Mate, even if I believed in TA, I wouldn't trust MY money to anything that wasn't tested within an inch of its life... > IME, it is the highly priced shares that a far more likely to burn you. Do you mean dollar price or p/e? Stephen ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
References
|