|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:35:42 +1200 |
Hi Stephen, > >>On the minus side that portfolio looks a little skewed towards the >>retail sector with MHI, WHS and WRI, even if WRI is really >>'industrial retail' and in a slightly different category. > > I hadn't considered WRI as a retail share - I was thinking of them as > being "agriculture", with a dash of finance. I can see what you mean > though. > I must admit I think of WRI as 'agriculture' too. That and the other rural retail shares are probably the best proxy you are going to get for sharing in the results of farming, short of owning one. My point of saying WRI is retailis that you may get a negative fall out from rising interest rates. But I guess you could argue the same with farmers and their land. > >>Those who buy a computer >>program and try to get rich quick seem to last only a few months at >>best, if the rate of churn of posters is anything to go by. > >I am a programmer, and I work for a bank. Mate, even if I believed in >TA, I wouldn't trust MY money to anything that wasn't tested within an >inch of its life... > The problem is you can't back test future events. > >>IME, it is the highly priced shares that a far more >>likely to burn you. > > Do you mean dollar price or p/e? > I mean high p/e. The dollar price itself is no indicator. By controlling the number of shares on issue management can make the dollar price whatever they like for a given earnings outlook. SNOOPY -- Message sent by Snoopy on Pegasus Mail version 4.02 ---------------------------------- "Sometimes to see the wood from the trees, you have to cut down all the trees." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|