|
Printable version |
From: | "gooner" <nickk@quicksilver.net.nz> |
Date: | Thu, 9 Jan 2003 22:03:18 +1300 |
Just returned from holiday and have caught up. My initial reaction is 'why grab candy when you can snatch gold bars!' Cheers Nk ----- Original Message ----- From: <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 10:27 AM Subject: [sharechat] Snoopy Review of 2002 > > "Hey baby." > > "Give me more of your candy." > > Those were the phrases that came to mind when summing up my own NZ > market investment performance in 2002. 34th place in the 'stock > guru' competition (in the top 10% of competitors) with a performance > of 20% return after tax is a result I am well pleased with. The > amazing thing was, looking back, how easy it all was. > > The year started in a cloud of fear with the imminent invasion of > Iraq, (which still hasn't happened), and the potential meltdown of > the US market on the horizon. But amazingly NZers continued to use > their telephones (TEL), continued to buy power (CEN) continued to > visit the Sky City Casino (SKC) and continued to buy takeaway food > (RBD). Meanwhile overseas appliance manufacturers have decided to > tool up so they can continue producing world class whiteware (SCT). > None of those predictive scenarios look that fantastic with > hindsight. Yet some would have you believe that the best way to > handle a 'bear market' from the January 2002 perspective is sit on > the sidelines and short shares. While investors ruled by fear did > just that, I enjoyed what was probably my best ever investment > performance on the NZ market. > > Of course I didn't pick all winners. The RBD price was knocked > around by the punters as optimism on the expansion in to > Australia first blossomed then faded. Personally I'm not concerned > and think that the long term business plan of RBD is very much on > track. > > I got the impression that following the loss of Frucor, a lot of the > 'go go' support for branded food shifted to RBD. Put simply, there > were some punters in there who expected too much too quickly. RBD > CEO Jim Collier did nothing to quell any fervour. If Collier has one > failing it is perhaps being too optimistic with the market > commentators! Combine that with the number of RBD shareholders who > really want the company to do well (I admit to being sucked into that > hollow updraft myself) and you can see how irrational exuberance > around RBD might develop. But will I be holding RBD in 2003? Most > definitely! > > My other big income share disappointment was Telecom. I have to > admit being worried by the deteriorating debt/equity position of > this company. I'm not sure that all the Australian write downs have > been dealt with. With the launch of 3G cellphones with Hutcheson in > Australia I see more costs clouding the horizon. My prediction is > that Telecom will surprise this year. But whether that surprise will > come from finally hitting the right note in Australia (positive), or > in the form of more Australian writedowns (negative), well my crystal > ball is cloudy on that score. > > We appear to have lost a couple of valued contributors (at least) > during the year. > > From the fundamental side of the fence, Hugh seemed to panic around > NZ election time and sold out of his major investment, Kiwi Income > Property Trust. Since then Hugh has been silent, although KIP > continues to do well. > > From the trader side of the fence (although to be fair calling > this person simply a 'trend trader' is selling him way too short) > Peter Maiden disappeared about mid year too. This was one of his > last coherent statements: > > "Rob puts a pretty compelling story around the risk > premium of stocks over bonds now being zero or negative. > This implies that bonds will outperform shares for the > next decade or longer - even though stocks have > outperformed bonds by 5% over the last 74 years." > > I wonder if Peter has now moved fully into bonds? If *I* had done > that to my income portfolio at the start of 2002 it would have taken > me about five years to achieve in the bond market what I have > achieved with my income investor shares in just one. > > Ah well, rest in peace you two. > > Income investors were presented with a couple of fabulous > opportunities during the year, those being to purchase WRI at just > over a dollar and LPC at around $1.40-$1.45. I alerted > sharechatters to these opportunities at the time, so I hope some of > you got in on them, as I did. Both shares have since moved > significantly higher. > > As we look into 2003 we are once again faced with the prospect of war > in Iraq and the possible meltdown of the US economy. So what will I > be doing? Probably not investing in US DOW tracking funds, nor in > Iraq! I don't expect another year as good as the last from the NZ > market, but I am sure that just as in 2002, some interesting > situations will develop. > > Rest assured that if any NZ CEO leaves their pram unattended for a > while for no good reason, I'll be in there stocking up on candy from > their baby. > > SNOOPY > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Message sent by Snoopy > e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz > on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 > ---------------------------------- > "Sometimes to see the wood from the trees, > you have to cut down all the trees." > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|