|
Printable version |
From: | Holden Glova <dsafari@paradise.net.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 9 Sep 2002 19:19:31 +1200 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 09 Sep 2002 15:47, Phaedrus wrote: [8-------- Snipped some words of wisdom ----------8] > If you are interested in the old battles, or the respective arguments, I > suggest you take a look at the old TLS thread of around June last year. > Both sides gave this one their best shot, in my opinion. Regards, > Phaedrus. Sorry, I really did not mean this thread to come out as "I want a debate about FA vs. TA". I guess I was more or less thinking aloud. Expressing what I felt uneasy about with value and asking if my idea for exploring TA was sound. I think I am still trying to found out what I am comfortable with. Thanks for responses to my post - always enlightening. P.S. I think it was Nick from GOLearn (could be mistaken) that recommended LHG. I've been monitoring it and it has risen approx 10% since mid last week. My paper observation is working out OK on that one. I wonder how you knew it was going to increase? - -- Signed, Holden Glova -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9fEuD0X8w8X71zPcRAu3zAJ4i/Ud6n5I1/uGtyCpMsAeRrCmLWwCcC/6u x4X7TnDY1+gVsj3XbQEGPsM= =F3jz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
References
|