|
Printable version |
From: | "Michael Phillips" <michael.p@paradise.net.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Aug 2002 20:14:30 +1200 |
reference: http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,2031289a13,00.html In the Sunday Star Times article by Garry Sheeran on 25 August 2002 entitled "Kiwi raider playing true to form on forest deal", Tony Gibbs is quoted as saying its investment in Trans Tasman Properties was an "absolute irritant - not one of our better deals". As a holder in TTP, I am keen to have this statement expanded for me somewhat. I understand that in April GPG (through a subsidiary) were keen to have TTP liquidated with funds returned to shareholders, whereas majority holder SEA Holdings Limited were not...thus the liquidation proceeded no further. Are there further reasons for GPG being irritated with their investment in TTP? If so, I would be keen to have these explained to me. Regards Michael === ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
|