|
Printable version |
From: | "Michael Phillips" <michael.p@paradise.net.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Aug 2002 20:21:40 +1200 |
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/features/nbr/article.php/e168c17e <blush> I think that the above article goes a long way toward answering my earlier question. Regards Michael === ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Phillips" <michael.p@paradise.net.nz> To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> Sent: Monday, 26 August 2002 20:14 Subject: [sharechat] GPG and their investment in TTP > reference: http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,2031289a13,00.html > > In the Sunday Star Times article by Garry Sheeran on 25 August 2002 > entitled "Kiwi raider playing true to form on forest deal", Tony Gibbs > is quoted as saying its investment in Trans Tasman Properties was an > "absolute irritant - not one of our better deals". > > As a holder in TTP, I am keen to have this statement expanded for me > somewhat. I understand that in April GPG (through a subsidiary) were > keen to have TTP liquidated with funds returned to shareholders, whereas > majority holder SEA Holdings Limited were not...thus the liquidation > proceeded no further. > > Are there further reasons for GPG being irritated with their investment > in TTP? If so, I would be keen to have these explained to me. > > Regards > Michael > === > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/ > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|