|
Printable version |
From: | "Ben Dutton" <bendutton@sharechat.co.nz> |
Date: | Wed, 19 Jun 2002 11:56:29 +1000 |
Snoopy, Thanks for your illuminating post - I (and I'm sure others) had no idea WRI was trading with such a high dividend yield. Your analysis of the situation is top-notch - better than most broker reports in fact. Some people must have taken your analysis to heart because WRI's up today. The company presents an excellent income opportunity indeed - thanks for bringing it to our attention. Best Regards Ben Dutton disc. no WRI ----- Original Message ----- From: <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 10:30 PM Subject: Re: [sharechat] Wrightsons Revisited > Hi phjones, > > > > > > > > Looks to me as if you have missed one boat and are about > > to sink the other. > > > > > > > Missed the boat by not buying gold a few months ago? Possibly, but > there is no need to catch every boat to be a successful investor. > There are always choices, and your choice depends on what your > strategy is. I wasn't out to discredit gold per se. I made the > 'Revisiting Wrightsons' post to show that in times of uncertainty > there are other strategies, rather than buying gold, out there. > > *I* don't invest in gold for the following reason. It is > difficult to mount a discounted cash flow argument based on the use > of gold as a material to justify the price of gold. There is a > fair amount of fear and greed built into the gold price movements. I > find emotions notoriously difficult to forecast. So why invest in > gold when, as I see it, there are far less risky strategies out > there? > > Personally I have two investment strategies running side by side. > There is my 'growth' strategy as reflected by the sort of investments > discussed in the focus investment group. There is my 'income' > strategy as reflected in my entry into the stock guru competition. I > realise that may sound a little perverse as the stock guru > competition is a growth competition. But I thought it interesting to > have have an 'anti-growth' (income) portfolio in there to keep all > you growth guys honest ;-). > > For you to criticise my income startegy ( specifically re Wrightsons > ) just because it doesn't fit with *your* idea of a good investment > is I think a little unfair. I topped on up WRI because of the yield > available. In hindsight it would have been better to buy in a couple > a years ago at 40c or so. So why didn't I do it then? At that stage > it was only paying a dividend of 1c per share, giving a gross yield > of only 3.5%. That sort of return is of no interest to an income > investor. So why didn't I buy WRI as a growth share at that time? > The management at the time had a poor track record, and there were > better growth opportunities available (as I saw it). And I think the > market today is telling us the WRI management still need to prove > themselves. With hindsight those who jumped in at 40c earned a > great return, but I would argue at high risk, if you take away the > benefit of the hindsight. > > Summing up, I don't think that with Wrightson at $1.04, my > suggestion of: > > short/medium term trader: Don't buy. > growth investor: Don't buy. > income investor: Buy > > is out of line. > > For the long term income investor (there is no other kind of income > investor that should be in the sharemarket as I see it), then I am > suggesting WRI is a good buy at today's prices. The long term income > investor is concerned with sustainable yield and I think WRI stacks > up well. If you think that buying into a share with the possibility > of a sustained yield of 15% is 'missing the boat', then I think you > have very little knowledge of income investing. I'm not saying *you* > should 'income invest'. It may not be right for you. I am saying > you should have some respect for those who use investment styles that > are different to what you yourself might use. Those people are not > necessarily wrong. In the investment game it's the discipline of > sticking to your own well thought out strategy that counts, whatever > that might be. And in my experience those who invest in bubble type > investments (as I believe gold is at the moment) usually don't have > the experience to know what a good entry price is, or when to get > out. But if you do, then good luck to you. > > SNOOPY > > > > --------------------------------- > Message sent by Snoopy > e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz > on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 > ---------------------------------- > "Dogs have big tongues, so you can bet they don't > bite them by accident" > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|