|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:30:11 +0000 |
Hi phjones, > > > Looks to me as if you have missed one boat and are about > to sink the other. > > Missed the boat by not buying gold a few months ago? Possibly, but there is no need to catch every boat to be a successful investor. There are always choices, and your choice depends on what your strategy is. I wasn't out to discredit gold per se. I made the 'Revisiting Wrightsons' post to show that in times of uncertainty there are other strategies, rather than buying gold, out there. *I* don't invest in gold for the following reason. It is difficult to mount a discounted cash flow argument based on the use of gold as a material to justify the price of gold. There is a fair amount of fear and greed built into the gold price movements. I find emotions notoriously difficult to forecast. So why invest in gold when, as I see it, there are far less risky strategies out there? Personally I have two investment strategies running side by side. There is my 'growth' strategy as reflected by the sort of investments discussed in the focus investment group. There is my 'income' strategy as reflected in my entry into the stock guru competition. I realise that may sound a little perverse as the stock guru competition is a growth competition. But I thought it interesting to have have an 'anti-growth' (income) portfolio in there to keep all you growth guys honest ;-). For you to criticise my income startegy ( specifically re Wrightsons ) just because it doesn't fit with *your* idea of a good investment is I think a little unfair. I topped on up WRI because of the yield available. In hindsight it would have been better to buy in a couple a years ago at 40c or so. So why didn't I do it then? At that stage it was only paying a dividend of 1c per share, giving a gross yield of only 3.5%. That sort of return is of no interest to an income investor. So why didn't I buy WRI as a growth share at that time? The management at the time had a poor track record, and there were better growth opportunities available (as I saw it). And I think the market today is telling us the WRI management still need to prove themselves. With hindsight those who jumped in at 40c earned a great return, but I would argue at high risk, if you take away the benefit of the hindsight. Summing up, I don't think that with Wrightson at $1.04, my suggestion of: short/medium term trader: Don't buy. growth investor: Don't buy. income investor: Buy is out of line. For the long term income investor (there is no other kind of income investor that should be in the sharemarket as I see it), then I am suggesting WRI is a good buy at today's prices. The long term income investor is concerned with sustainable yield and I think WRI stacks up well. If you think that buying into a share with the possibility of a sustained yield of 15% is 'missing the boat', then I think you have very little knowledge of income investing. I'm not saying *you* should 'income invest'. It may not be right for you. I am saying you should have some respect for those who use investment styles that are different to what you yourself might use. Those people are not necessarily wrong. In the investment game it's the discipline of sticking to your own well thought out strategy that counts, whatever that might be. And in my experience those who invest in bubble type investments (as I believe gold is at the moment) usually don't have the experience to know what a good entry price is, or when to get out. But if you do, then good luck to you. SNOOPY --------------------------------- Message sent by Snoopy e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 ---------------------------------- "Dogs have big tongues, so you can bet they don't bite them by accident" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
References
|