|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Sun, 14 Apr 2002 22:17:58 +0000 |
Hi Nick, > > >Partly in response to Snoopy.......you could have held AIRNZ for >income from 3 yrs back.........look where you'd be now with them @ >32c > >you could have held FFS for income when they were $2.20 a few years >back.........now @ 25c...... > >Brierley paid a god divvy when they were $6....now @ 51c... > >Buy and hold has its drawbacks. > > Yes. But what you have shown is that when you buy something to 'buy and hold', you have to be careful what you buy, and at what price you buy it at. Just like not all shares are suitable for trading, not all shares are suitable for 'buy and hold'. And not all high yield shares (as reported in the paper which means yesterday's earnings divided by today's share price) are suitable as income shares either. SNOOPY --------------------------------- Message sent by Snoopy e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 ---------------------------------- "You can tell me I'm wrong twice, but that still only makes me wrong once." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|