Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - September 2001

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

[sharechat] Why I dont invest in financial service providers


From: Marilyn Munroe <who.c@res.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 12:03:19 +1200


The fact a well run bank with a reputation for financial probity, can get it so wrong illustrates my phobia against investments in financial service providers.

The instance I refer  to  is the US$1.7 billion hit taken by the National Australia Bank due to a fault in the financial modeling software in its United States mortgage provider subsidiary.

When a manufacturer or services company declines the fall takes a period of time. Financial services providers often just go bang! Your investment in such a company can vaporize in the flash of a profit announcement.

The fact that NAB is a well established well run bank means that they are able to pay a dividend, but how well are other financial service providers managed?

Boop-boop-de-do Marilyn

P S It is often difficult to visualize $1.7 billion. Expressed in figures it is 1,700,000,000.
Remember this is in Greenbacks not Kiwi Roubles. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] dpc Ruth Ayling
Previous by Date: Re: [sharechat] historical data Ben Dutton ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: Re: [sharechat] Why I dont invest in financial service providers Gary Wilson - Brisbane
Previous by Thread: Re: [sharechat] MIG - Placement of shares and Cash issue. G Stolwyk ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]