|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:02:46 +0000 |
Hi RIL, > > > A 300 mio loss and no one has anything to say about > it. > > Why was Transalta bought? Why were the correct > forecasts on electicity prices not made? Why were the > price movements not hedged? Who is responsible? > > Do you no longer care about your money? > > As a former shareholder in Tranalta "I care" RIL, which is why I accepted the Natural Gas cash offer rather than the share swap offer. Your post made me take a peek at my 'library of shame'. This collection of dubious literature includes the outrageously optimistic Frucor prospectus, an Equitycorpse Annual report from the time just before they went belly up, and (surprise, surprise) the Grant Samuel and Associates valuation of Transalta, at the time of the NGC takeover offer. I quote from section 5.1: "NGC has offered $2.79 cash for each Transalta share. The NGC offer is *above the valuation range* and accordingly the terms and conditions are fair to the holders of Transalta ordinary shares not associated with NGC" By implication this reads the offer was *not* a good deal for NGC shareholders (the buyers). Then from 5.2.1 "However the assessment of the the NGC offer is concerned with the realisable value of NGC shares immediately after the transaction. *The decision to hold NGC shares is a separate investment decision to be made by shareholders.*" IMHO this was a gross abdication of responsibility by Grant Samuel. They were approaching the merger with the idea that people getting NGC shares that it was not their responsibility to give any indication on the outlook for their new investment. Grant Samuel stated: "The NGC share price in effect represents a reasonable assessment of value by a well informed market. The NGC share price in effect represents the consensus view of analysts and investors that follow and scrutinise the company. There is no basis for believing that an individual external assessment of value would provide any more reliable guide to the value of NGC shares than is provided by the market price." Which IMHO was the ultimate cop out. Subsequent events have shown that these 'analysts' actually had no idea how the NZ electricity industry works, and that relying on the 'the market only' to be able to provide an effective on-going evaluation of NGCs future prospects was a very bad decision. What is even more aggrevating reading this report again is this comment under section 3.8.3: "Retailers with a higher level of own generation, i.e. Contact Energy, have a lower risk profile than Transalta and are potentially in a better position to discount prices to attract new customers. It is also conceivable that generators will not bid surplus capacity into the NZEM (which is optional) in an attempt to increase spot prices to disadvantage retailers such as Transalta." ...which is exactly what happened! So it would seem that Grant Samuel did indeed have a good grip on what might happen, yet chose *not* to emphasise the point! To anyone who actually read the report between the lines, in detail, the meaning was clear. If you want to invest in the electricity industry sell NGC and buy CEN. If you compare the share prices of each at the time of the offer and today NGC (~$1.50, now $1) and CEN (~$2.60 now $3.30) you will see that the Grant Samuel advice was spot on. Fortunately for me, I followed this advice. Pity Grant Samuel didn't emphasise that point to the hapless Transalta shareholders who swapped their shares for NGC shares though. SNOOPY disclosure: ex-Transalta, now CEN shareholder. --------------------------------- Message sent by Snoopy e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 ---------------------------------- "Dogs have big tongues, so you can bet they don't bite them by accident" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
Replies
References
|