|
Printable version |
From: | "Paul and Noriko" <pan@muh.biglobe.ne.jp> |
Date: | Tue, 3 Jul 2001 10:09:53 +0900 |
I think that is a great comment. Yet charts are useful in that they present the same info in a different way. People respond differently to different stimuli, just in the way that students do in relation to different teaching styles. Some investors don't need charts to consistently beat the average - and can't understand why or how others need the charts to get the same result. People should just respect that, and stop having the endless argument over what is more useful. It certainly is fascinating as an investor to be made aware of a different approach to being successful. There's nothing wrong with that at all. ----- Original Message ----- From: <hugh.webber@clear.net.nz> To: Phaedrus <Phaedrus@techemail.com>; <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> Sent: Monday, 2 July 2001 09:25 Subject: Re: [sharechat] Chartists. > "That wasn't a small dip in Frucor's share price. The > uptrend was over. For the first time in two months there were lower peaks and > lower > valleys - the usual definition of a downtrend. Whether the stock went up, down > or > sideways from here on would not alter the fact that there had been an uptrend, > and > it had ended." > > The part that puzzles me is that if charting doesn't predict then what is the > point of it? It doesn't analyse in terms of the things that matter i.e. the > quality of the management, the product, the market characteristics,the gross > yield %, the nta per share, the p/e, the yield on shareholders funds, the growth > of earnings per share. > So, if it doesn't predict and it doesn't analyse why bother doing it? Its just > a diversion of energy and reources from the things that do matter to serious > investors. > Is the apparent info that the 'uptrend has ended' useful? Not unless it can > be relied on (highly doubtful) or that there is a rationale for it that can > be analysed in meaningful terms e.g. a competing product has come on the market > - but surely that sort of info will have become apparent much earlier from elsewhere > without relying on charts. > "Whether the stock went up down or sideways from here...." So what's the point > of saying the uptrend had ended if the stock then resumed its upward movement? > It might have been caused by say the chairman having a heart attack and then > recovering but the chart doesn't tell you that. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
References
|