|
Printable version |
From: | "Ben Dutton" <bendutton@sharechat.co.nz> |
Date: | Wed, 2 May 2001 10:37:29 +1200 |
Thanks for taking the time to write this post Greg, another great contribution to this fascinating debate on Air New Zealand - I look forward to more comment from sharechatters. Best Regards Ben Dutton (Disc. do not hold AIRVA/B) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg" <g&jelliott@xtra.co.nz> To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 11:25 PM Subject: Re: [sharechat] Airline shares > Thanks Bruce, Snoopy and Peter. Interesting discussion. Air NZ have posted > alot of data (performance results, forecasts, issues, strategy) on their > website. Plus I've just scanned through 800 media articles looking at the > two airlines over the last year. I'm not a 'qualified' analyst, but I > suspect the prognosis may not be as bad as recent media and some > share-houses present. Reminds me of the bad press Apple computer was getting > in 96, as they slid into the red. OK - that may be drawing a long bow, but > my money is still on Air NZ for a quicker and more sustainable recovery than > is predicted. The mechanisms are largely in place (management restructure, > overhaul of engineering practices, fleet replacement, cultural realignment), > plus a number of associated revenue earners (including the P&W JV). > > They made mistakes during the transition...OK, I'll be honest - it was a > mess. Leadership vacuum and one of the most difficult trading periods in ten > years. But we are seeing a major change in philosophy from the > McCrea/Cushing era to the Toomey era. There are intangibles here which have > the potential to lift the groups performance (Toomey's more approachable > leadership style and willingness to invest, which may unlock more of the > potential residing within the expanded group). It has taken time (not quick > enough to stop CASA), but the building blocks are being put in place to > unlock the synergies of integration and not only compete, but dominate. > Also, don't discount the influence and cash power of SIA, working from > behind the scenes. The same SIA who owns nearly half of Virgin Blue! > > In NZ, I suspect Air NZ will be able to compete with Virgin's no frills, if > and when, using Freedom. Keeps the backpackers happy - not a money spinner, > but its about dominance. They're already ahead so far. The real battle will > be with Qantas, and for the business customers. At this stage, looks like > Qantas' is mainly focused on main trunk routes, plus some provincials with > Origin. Air NZ has a head start then, and a larger net and will compete > head-on. They could afford to do some minor optimisation on the provincial > routes to sew these up (the SAAB is a reliable work horse on existing routes > but they could do with 2 more, also more ATRs and focus on the shorter main > trunk routes, and focus the Beech 1900s on the short provincial routes). > There is growth potential here. I hope the new 'Ventures' division are > working on this already - the provincials were a bit slow off the mark when > Qantas NZ crashed. Oh, and remember that it was 'Qantas' who crashed! > > The real battle in Australia is against Qantas/Impulse (ex), where the > corporate customers are. Hazelton offers valuable routes and schedules. > Toomey's staff will be focused on completing the rationalisation of > management initiatives (IT, downsizing, network planning, marketing - > including some 'rebranding' to rebuild customer confidence and loyalty) and > regain market share. > > At the international level, the new groups focus has always been on > Australasia, plus LA which is lucrative. Air NZ pulled out of Europe - those > routes are now covered by code-sharing through the Star Alliance. > > This talk about access to London as an offset for allowing Virgin into NZ is > a red herring. Virgin Blue cannot provide any offset to the UK, since it is > an Australian airline. Besides, the UK is not the group's strategic focus - > Australasia is. As a combined group, they have the routes and access to make > this hum, and its a growing market - especially if the similarities noted > between the USA in the 1980s and Japan today prove substantial - watch > Japan! > > It would be interesting to re-do Snoopy's analysis again soon (I liked the > analysis, don't know that the loss will be that great, and in any event it > will be the bottom). Basically, Air NZ were knocked up against the ropes > recently, but they're in this for the long haul, and I believe they are > right now positioning for a good fight. Not to be overlooked. > > Disc (hold AIRVB) > > Greg Elliott > > From: Bruce Withers <withers@xtra.co.nz> > > Reply-To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz > > Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 21:00:37 +1200 > > To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz > > Subject: Re: [sharechat] Airline shares > > > > Re British Air Rights: > > Heathrow is almost at gridlock...who wants to encourage more landings from Air > > NZ? Not in the Brits interest, so not an arguement for Virgin. > > > > Rgds > > > > Bruce > > > > "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" wrote: > > > >> Hi Peter, > >> > >> I enjoyed your wee rant on Airline shares. But here are some of the > >> counter view points, with particular regard to Air New Zealand. > >> > >>> > >>> Airline in the news a lot - what future for them? Will Air New > >>> Zealand ever make money again? > >>> > >>> The orange Virgin 767 looks pretty impressive, and at home, sitting > >>> on the tarmac at Wellington this afternoon. > >>> > >> > >> And that may be the last we see of it. It would seem Virgin are > >> mainly interested in the trans- tasman route, with an Auckland > >> Wellington Christchurch sweep stitched into the middle while they are > >> here. There is the tiny matter of international air rights to be > >> negotiated. And if Virgin are successful, it would seem that Air > >> New Zealand would get some compensation through better access to the > >> British market. > >> > >>> > >>> As said earlier AIRVA share price been trending down since 1993. > >>> > >> > >> Air New Zealand is not really the same company any more. It has > >> gone from being a a niche fringe airline to a global sized player as > >> it doubled in size. I don't think you can take the past trend of > >> AIRVA as a useful future predictor of the direction of AIR from here > >> on. > >> > >> > >>> > >>> I have re-read the Unlimited story 'On a wing and a prayer' > >>> > >>> One part of the article that struck me was - > >>> Andy Serwer wrote about > >>> investment in airline stocks. "Never, I repeat, never buy > >>> airlines," he said. His rationale was that airlines have the > >>> cost structure from hell. To whit: > >>> > >>> > >>> a.. They have to borrow huge sums of money to buy planes, > >>> leaving them at the whim of interest rates (a factor totally > >>> out of their control). > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Globally the world's equivalents of our Don Brash seem to be doing > >> what they can to keep interest rates low. I don't see the return of > >> 20% interest rates which sank some airlines in the mid 1980s. > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> b.. They use huge amounts of fuel, leaving them at the whim of > >>> oil prices (a factor totally out of their control). > >>> > >>> > >> > >> As far as I can tell the bad news of rising fuel prices over the last > >> year or so have already been built in to current airline share > >> prices. I feel it unlikely that the world's oil producing nations > >> will drastically spike prices again in the foreseeable future. > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> c.. They are at the whim of strong unions > >>> (you guessed it, a factor almost totally out of their > >>> control). > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Air New Zealand would probably have a better employment record than > >> say Qantas New Zealand or Kiwi Air. If anything AIR are able to > >> dictate the wages paid to their employees, not the other way around. > >> There aren't too many other airline operators out there for > >> disgruntled employees to move to. > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> d.. > >>> If, Serwer argues, some of the world's most serious investors - > >>> including Warren Buffett with US Air - can lose big-time buying > >>> into airlines, what hope is there for the rest of us? > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Buying into a US Airline in the USA is more akin to buying into a > >> small shuttle bus company in New Zealand, rather than buying into Air > >> New Zealand. > >> > >> US Air is a domestically focussed business. There are few > >> regulatory barriers to operating within the United States for a new > >> airline start up. On the other hand, an operator wishing to compete > >> with Air New Zealand on international routes must negotiate > >> international landing rights with the New Zealand Government (if a > >> foreign airline) or with a foreign government (if New Zealand based). > >> > >> It could be argued that, Origin Pacific excepted, Air New Zealand is > >> the only operator with a credible record of running a sustainable > >> Airline business in our country's history. > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> Airline shares for me - no way > >>> > >>> > >> > >> I wouldn't buy 'Airline shares'(generic) either. But that > >> doesn't mean you can't have a successful investment if you > >> selectively buy only the best 'Airline share'. SNOOPY > >> > >> disclosure: Holds AIR > >> > >> --------------------------------- > >> Message sent by Snoopy > >> e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz > >> on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 > >> ---------------------------------- > >> "You can tell me I'm wrong twice, > >> but that still only makes me wrong once." > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- > >> http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors > >> http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- > >> To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > >> http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors > > http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors > http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
References
|