|
Printable version |
From: | "Andrew Dengel" <adengel@voyager.co.nz> |
Date: | Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:40:25 +1200 |
Mike, Good post!
I believe you are correct in your assumptions, most of us mere mortals don’t have
the capital/time or knowledge to invest directly into overseas markets,
particularly some of the more obscure regions and sectors. Unit trusts can be a
great way for a reasonably informed investor who is prepared to put some time
into monitoring his/her investments to gain access to and perform well in these
areas. Problem has been in the past that your
average mum and dad is put into one of these trusts, usually with the whole lot
in one managed account eg balanced and left there! They don’t know/don’t care
(until cash up time!!) what it is and the salesman doesn’t monitor or advise
them about it once its up and running! I know this because I was in the
industry and sold them myself and whilst I am not tarring all with the same
brush that is generally what happens. However as
I mentioned before, if you are prepared to put a bit of time and effort into it
you can do well. Sovereign for example don’t charge any fees for fund switching
and have quite a range of specific region funds etc, last year the Far East
fund hit over a 100% return (first NZ trust to do so I believe) this year its
running at –40%! But it shows if you are prepared to monitor and move your
funds around it can be a good way of gaining access to these markets. As you are
no doubt aware there are numerous companies and funds available, fees generally
are pretty good nowadays, be aware that the approx 5% entry fee many charge is
the planners/advisors commission, this is negotiable!! They don’t have to take
it, now obviously they have to make a living but shop around and negotiate
often you can get it down to 3 or 2 % or some will charge you a flat fee or
time based charge instead. Cheers Andrew -----Original
Message----- I've
been reading and thinking about these trusts over the last while and weighing
up the pros and cons of index and managed funds. I have
never invested in them and some Q's I'm left with are. It
seems a good way to get exposure to overseas markets for the majority of people
and to diversify their portfolios but why even bother with aggressive funds and
their extra fees if in the long term index funds seem to outperform or at least
equal them! ? Given
that most fund managers allow you to move some or all of your $$ around their
funds a couple of times a year without fees wouldn't one be better to
concentrate on economies and regions in their broadest terms and move funds
into ones that are performing well at the time and out if things look bad? Given
all the best intentions in the world most of us without having access to a
constant supply of info about companies on the other sides of the world will
find it very difficult to make as informed decisions as we might with those
close to home in Aust and NZ, isn't using the fund managers ready
researched choices is time and cost effective? Do you
get a list of the co's invested in by your manager or in the case of an index
fund if it just assumed you will know or don't care?! any
thoughts cheers iccon still
spewing about not trading commsoft (198c) for carters (170c) in November
like my mind was telling me to. oh well my one little tech wreck I guess! |
References
|