|
Printable version |
From: | "Ian Andrews" <iandrews@ihug.co.nz> |
Date: | Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:58:56 +1300 |
I think the answer is "herd instinct" - which is
the reason so many so-called "experts" are working for salary instead of being
financially independent.Journalists are paid for startling headlines, not for
making investors wealthy.
The best thing one can do in investing is to ignore
them & do the study oneself.
FFS's underlying assets, even after completely
discounting CNIF make it by far the best value for money forestry block around;
the price made even more compelling by having processing & marketing economy
of scale & plant thrown in, with political support( because of the
company's importance to rural employment & the economy).
Actually, Credit Suisse First Boston , the lead
underwriter, were recommending it as a buy. Too many people suspected them
of conflict of interest, without appreciating they were also in the best
position to know FFS's true value.
The technical story was also compelling, as
motivated sellers started disappearing when the price dipped below 28 cents
& a "basin" formed.
Disclosure - FFS shareholder.
|
Replies
|