|
Printable version |
From: | "G Stolwyk" <stolwyk@wave.co.nz> |
Date: | Sun, 7 Jan 2001 11:23:49 +1300 |
Anna,
In my opinion, brokers hope that their mentioned stocks will
have a priority in the minds of investors.
In the past, some brokers may have felt that
they had an obligation to their client companies and hence recommended
them.
Some of these recommendations were ' shockers' and
yet investors fell for them.
The laws of libel prevent me from mentioning a few
examples, but experienced investors will know some!
I am quite happy with the procedure but
would insist that the 'Herald' discloses which companies were
the brokers' clients.
The investor can then decide what effect it
will have on their selections.
Brokers' reports already mention when they have a
recommended company as a client and this should be applied here as
well.
We are concerned with a strong reduction in
bias when these brokers are mentioned. I think that they have
nothing to hide and would welcome this!
I for one, do not take much notice of these
recommendations, but some do, and they at least ought to be
supplied with the tools to make a decision!
To most of us it is light hearted stuff, but to
those who only have a few hard earned dollars to spare, it could be
important!
Gerry
|
|