|
Printable version |
From: | Derek <dkw@paradise.net.nz> |
Date: | Wed, 06 Sep 2000 18:52:04 +1200 |
I find it difficult to imagine that the absence of a factor in milk can produce huge profits. (but I guess with our low dollar a large profit isn't needed these days to make it look good in NZ dollars). It is very unlikely that the solution to the A1 problem will be to remove the A1 protein from A1 positive milk (yes I've carried out ion exchange myself - hundreds of times), its far easier to use A1 free cows. After your done selling the DNA screening kit, the need for which will fade out in a few years due to breeding, then where is the money coming from? How well is the screening system tied up? A kit that tests for DNA may be patented, but what about the test for the protein in milk using antibodies ? What about any other methods? How well are the trademarks tied up? For example there is little point in Trademarking 'A2 True' milk, when someone else can come along and call their product 'A2 Only' milk. Also is there such thing as a generic trademark, protecting any phrase which indicates 'A2 True' ? There are many questions, but I haven't researched the A2 thing so maybe someone out there has some answers. Derek ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
References
|