|
Printable version |
From: | "John and Beth Schwartfeger" <timestwo@xtra.co.nz> |
Date: | Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:49:36 +1200 |
Brian,
Interesting thoughts but it raises the question. Who is better
at managing your money? You or the company? Surely you have a right to take your
share of profits from a company you own and invest them as you think fit. The
results of that would mean you are ultimately esponsible then for your own
destiny as it was you who made the investment decisions.
Being an ex dairy farmer where it is rife that the companies
believe they can use your money better than you can yourself they were for ever
with holding money from payout to invest in factories and other companies on
your behalf under the pretext it would benefit your payout further down the
track. Unfortunately payout went backwards for many years and the guess for 10
years time is payout will still be at its current levels. To me in that case I
would be better off having my share of the profit to try and invest and see if I
myself couldn't get a greater return.
The logic that by maintaining money within the company and
expanding or reinvesting as they want just doesn't seem to be the case. Not
being the brightest in this chat site at company and share business I wouldn't
start to try and teach anyone in here but my initial assessment indicates that
share price has more to do with fashion at times than anything else. Restaurant
Brands for example reported they had their 6th quarter profit in a row (I think
thats what it said:))yet their share price languishes. Is it because of a
dividend payment or is it because they are out of fashion? This could be argued
with many companies and really is a chicken and egg argument.. Just like
the question about the American share market and its dividend / share price
comparison. Another chicken and egg argument.
I could be wrong in my line of thought but personally I vote
for high dividend payment so I can control my own investments but not at the
cost of inhibiting the company. Give a company more money to spend and they pay
higher directors fees, more flasher company cars and so many other wasteful non
profit making expenses.
Just my thoughts.
Cheers.. John Schwartfeger
|
Replies
|