Yes, an interesting scenario has developed with MON. Lion
Nathan's defensive move to block Fosters from gaining Montana and its
distribution network seems to have worked.
"Fosters has indicated it will not challenge Lion" says the NZ
Herald.
But LNN also don't seem interested in gaining full control of the
MON.
Even though Peter Masfen believes Montana is undervalued, here's a quote
from the AFR "Salomon Smith Barney analyst Mr Clyde D'Souza said $NZ2.30 per
share was "a full price", with his valuation at $NZ2.10 on a discounted cash
flow basis, and $NZ2.38 on a sum-of-the-parts valuation".
So, to sell or not to sell? I think you'll have to decide that one
yourself Nick :)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 5:54 PM
Subject: [sharechat] Montana...... The
dilemma
Very
interesting day for all us montana shareholders, question
is what to do.
My broker at j.b.weres
wasnt much help, the price of 2.30 is approaching their
valuation of the stock but he wasnt advising me
to sell. He thought that
once lion ghad purchased the shares they are
after the price could fall back
a little.
However there would not
bew many left to sell, anybody who wants out can do
so now for 2.30 so i suspect the price is going
to remain around that price , may
even go higher.
I also hold gpg and this
cannot be bad for them. They wont have much
influence but only paid an average of 2.06 for
their shares so shoiuld do ok
out of it.
I confess to having an unhealthy attachment to montana, it was the
first
stock i ever bought and i have been topping up
ever since. Im loathe to sell
them and iin the long run i suspect it will be
better to stay in for the ride.
Question is could
i sell now and dive back in at a lower price.
i was expecting this forum to be full of
montana talk, but as usual
aql and itc are dominating the chat (will they
ever learn?)
nick