|
Printable version |
From: | "Nigel Bree" <nbree@kcbbs.gen.nz> |
Date: | Tue, 9 May 2000 01:19:11 +1200 |
Richard Scott wrote: > Tremendous reply Nigel. Most entertaining. Well, what could I do... some dry excerpt from the sci.physics FAQ? Not as entertaining as the legends of the Galactic Patrol, eh? After all, any serious attempt to explain why this stuff is nonsense will be as impenetrable to most folks as the gobbledegook on the "Intertialess Drive" site. Upon reflection, it's not as easy to find that stuff in bookshops these days, so to help investors do their due diligence on this NZ company and gain some <cough> idea what the NZ site is on about, we present: http://www.ripping-pub.co.uk/RippingSF/OldRip/galactic1.html Load that sucker up and search for "inertialess" if you want, but for the full impact grit your teeth and read the lot. I dare ya. Wonder if the "Doc" will be cited in the patents? After all, _Galactic Patrol_ was first published in 1937 and the Doc had been working on the Lensman story in the 20s so surely that counts as prior art. :-) :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.
References
|