Sharechat Logo

Antitrust regulator checks on savings impact from 2009 credit card fee

Thursday 18th October 2012

Text too small?

The Commerce Commission has embarked on a survey of retailers to find out what impact its 2009 settlement agreements with credit card issuers MasterCard International and Visa and other financial institutions over the fees charged to cover banks costs of credit card transactions.

The antitrust regulator will survey more than 3,000 retailers nationwide to find out what impact the new rules have had at the till, it said in a statement.

In 2009, the commission cut deals with over fees that were smeared across a range of transactions, including cash and eftpos, to cover the surcharge on credit cards. Vendors spread the cost because they weren't allowed to recover the fee directly from the cardholder.

At the time of the settlements, the regulator said it expected to see savings to retailers of between $70 million and $80 million. Since the October 2009 settlement, annual total credit card billings in New Zealand have grown every month except in July of this year when it was flat, according to Reserve Bank data.

"We want to know what their experience has been since the credit card scheme rules have been changed," chairman Mark Berry said.

The settlements meant credit card issuers could individually set intercharge rates that applied to credit card transactions, merchants could apply surcharges to payments made by credit card and non-bank institutions could join the Visa and MasterCard credit card schemes as acquirers if they met certain criteria.

The regulator recovered $3 million from the MasterCard settlement, $2.6 million from Visa, and an aggregate $1 million from ANZ National, ASB, Westpac New Zealand, Bank of New Zealand, Kiwibank, TSB Bank, and Warehouse Financial Services.

BusinessDesk.co.nz



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

December 27th Morning Report
FBU - Fletcher Building Announces Director Appointment
December 23rd Morning Report
MWE - Suspension of Trading and Delisting
EBOS welcomes finalisation of First PWA
CVT - AMENDED: Bank covenant waiver and trading update
Gentrack Annual Report 2024
December 20th Morning Report
Rua Bioscience announces launch of new products in the UK
TEM - Appointment to the Board of Directors