Sharechat Logo

Fonterra pushes for revamp of R&D funding methods

By Duncan Bridgeman

Friday 25th June 2004

Text too small?
Changes to the way certain research and development is funded in this country are expected as Fonterra seeks more efficiency for the dairy industry.

The dairy giant is in talks with the government over ways of co-ordinating R&D funding for the pastoral sector so Fonterra is not burdened with spending money on research not directly benefiting its value-added goals.

It has already cut funding to its own biotechnology arm Vialactia to concentrate its research on areas that return direct benefits to the co-operative's farmer shareholders.

Chief executive Andrew Ferrier said he was looking for a more efficient model that "makes sense" for all parties involved.

"We want to avoid as much duplication into the farming sector as possible."

For example, Vialactia carried out research into ryegrass genetics that benefited all farmers. Yet there were also other entities doing research into pasture quality for "industry good" purposes, such as levy-funded Dairy Insight.

Other R&D organisations included AgResearch and Dexcel, Crop & Food Research, various universities and Livestock Improvement Corporation.

"What we are saying to the government is that we want the research to be done but we want it done in a more efficient way."

Ferrier said the pastoral sector was underweighted in terms of R&D funding, given that it produced around 70% of gross domestic product.

"It doesn't get anywhere near like 70% of the government spend in this area but we're going to try and ensure ourselves that the spend is at least efficient."

Meanwhile, Fonterra confirmed it had cut its funding to Vialactia and laid off seven staff. Its original funding package was $150 million over five years.

  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

December 5th Morning Report
Kiwi Property launches Green Bond offer
TEM - Transaction in Own Shares
December 2nd Morning Report
MWE - Intention to De-list from the NZX Main Board
KMD Brands announces Release of Climate-Related Disclosure
Rua Bioscience expands product range in New Zealand
SPG - HY25 Interim Results
PaySauce FY25 Half Year Result and Interim Report
Synlait releases Integrated Climate Report