By Jenny Ruth
Sunday 29th August 2010 3 Comments |
Text too small? |
Sky Network Television is in danger of developing "an embarrassment of riches" with an extremely under-leveraged and inefficient balance sheet with estimated gearing of just 12% by June 2014, says Sarndra Urlich, an analyst at First NZ Capital.
Sky isn't in the mature stage of its life cycle but its ever-increasing operating cashflow and a normalisation of capital spending is likely to yield a free cashflow surplus in the order of $190 million for the year ending June 2014, Urlich says.
Comparing the pay TV company with its peers implies it could easily take on an additional $300 million to $400 million in debt, she says.
"Even better, Sky has the capacity to [tax efficiently] gear up its balance sheet through increasing its payout ratio from 60% to 100%, paying out a special dividend .. and by undertaking a share buyback," she says.
"By our estimates, Sky could combine all of these measures and still maintain a robust balance sheet."
The key challenge though is Sky's 43.7% major shareholder News Corp isn't "renowned for returning capital to shareholders, preferring to grow rather than shrink its asset base."
Something needs to be done to engineer a more efficient balance sheet. "The alternative, of course, is that this embarrassment of riches makes Sky a very attractive corporate target."
Recommendation: Neutral.
Sky TV let off on alleged past breaches of competition law
Sky TV board adds Snakk's Handley, ex-SAP exec McBride
Sky Network increases profit, dividend as it battles increased rivalry
TVNZ, Sky TV to wait up to 6 years for Igloo to breakeven, state broadcaster says
UPDATE Murdoch's News Ltd to sell Sky TV stake for $815.3M in discounted placement
Murdoch's News Ltd to exits Sky TV stake in sale reported to be at discount
Sky TV lifts 1H profit 9 percent as subscribers spend more, migrate to My Sky
Sky TV makes $124.5 mln special dividend to distribute tax credits
Todd Communications ends 22-year interest in Sky TV, sells stake
Sky TV content agreements need more investigation, regulator concludes