Sharechat Logo

Analysts attack 'misleading' Vertex Group prospectus

By Nick Stride

Friday 14th June 2002

Text too small?
Alan Robb
Analysts and accounting professionals have taken issue with the prospectus for a sharemarket float of plastics packaging company Vertex Group, saying some of the figures are likely to mislead investors.

Their problem is with the presentation of the company's financial results for the year ended March 2002.

These show revenue of $89.17 million, earnings before interest and tax (ebit) of $3.71 million and a bottom-line profit of $3.81 million.

But footnotes to the prospectus table show those figures include a $2.43 million gain on the sale and leaseback of land and buildings.

Included in the ebit and net profit figures are a $2.15 million gain on revaluation of intangible assets and plant and equipment, and $2.08 million of restructuring costs.

Alan Robb, a senior lecturer in accountancy at the University of Canterbury, said the presentation of results "is poor and likely to mislead."

All three one-off items should have been disclosed in the statement of financial performance, not as footnotes, Mr Robb said.

"There is a line in that table headed 'extraordinary items' which contains no figures at all. This suggests there were no unusual items but that's patently untrue when one reads notes 2 and 3," he said.

A sharebroking analyst, who declined to be named, agreed, saying that, adjusted for one-offs, Vertex's "core" ongoing earnings for 2002 were only $1.31 million.

"That means the 2003 forecasts are for ebit growth of 65% and net earnings growth of 342% on revenue growth of just 4%. How credible is that?"

Mr Robb said, when one-offs were taken into account, the expectation that earnings would grow to the forecast 2003 figures was questionable.

Shoeshine

  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

November 26th Morning Report
Rua Bioscience Sales Update
Channel Infrastructure announces equity raise
November 25th Morning Report
WCO - Acquisition of Civic Waste, Convertible Note & SPP
ATM - FY25 revenue guidance and dividend policy
November 22th Morning Report
General Capital Announces Another Profit Record
Infratil Considers Infrastructure Bond Offer
Argosy FY25 Interim Result