Sharechat Logo

Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom loses Supreme Court bid to access US evidence against him

Friday 21st March 2014

Text too small?

Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom lost his Supreme Court bid to access US government evidence against him ahead of his extradition hearing to face charges in the US related to operating websites used to illegally distribute copyrighted content such as music and movies.

In a decision released today, the Supreme Court in Wellington ruled by a majority that an earlier decision by the District Court was wrong to order the US to disclose more information than was provided in its 'record of the case' summary. Chief Justice Sian Elias dissented from the majority.

The Supreme Court's decision upholds an earlier ruling by the Appeal Court after the High Court sided with the District Court, saying the relevant documents should be handed over. German-born Dotcom, who now lives in New Zealand, along with his co-accused, Finn Batato, Mathias Ortmann and Bram van der Kolk, are facing extradition to the US on charges related to their file sharing website which the US government alleges encouraged users to upload copyright works for others to download.

"A record of the case must include a summary of the evidence relied on and, in this case, that has been provided," Justice John McGrath said in the Supreme Court judgment. "It does not have to summarise all evidential material that the state may rely on at a trial. No basis in law has been shown for the appellants to seek further disclosure or information concerning the case against them."

Justice Elias argued that the District Court had the right to seek more information than the 'record of the case' summary in exceptional cases.

Costs were reserved.

 

BusinessDesk.co.nz



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

December 27th Morning Report
FBU - Fletcher Building Announces Director Appointment
December 23rd Morning Report
MWE - Suspension of Trading and Delisting
EBOS welcomes finalisation of First PWA
CVT - AMENDED: Bank covenant waiver and trading update
Gentrack Annual Report 2024
December 20th Morning Report
Rua Bioscience announces launch of new products in the UK
TEM - Appointment to the Board of Directors