By Phil Boeyen, ShareChat Business News Editor
Wednesday 14th March 2001 |
Text too small? |
CNZ says the dispute arose out of an aborted takeover of Shortland Properties, which it now owns.
It claims that Shortland incurred substantial costs in considering a takeover by a Kiwi Income subsidiary and, following a decision not to proceed, sought to recover those costs.
Part of the dispute centred on the fact that the takeover offer had not been formalised, but the High Court held that a formal offer was not necessary and that the subsidiary was liable for the costs incurred by Shortland in considering the offer.
"CNZ is pleased with the decision as it gives substance to the principal purpose of takeover legislation - to protect shareholders of the company being taken over," the company says in a statement.
Capital Properties says the amount of costs to be recovered has not been ruled on but it will now move to have the matter determined.
No comments yet
Kiwi Income Property Trust
Kiwi Income sells Queen St building to Australian firm
Kiwi Income Property may need to sell assets or raise equity to exit management contract
Kiwi Income manager stays mum on internalisation proposal, sees retail, Auckland office improving
Kiwi Income manager mulls Commonwealth Bank proposal to internalise contract
Kiwi Income Property sees smaller payout in 2014 as annual earnings fall 15 percent
Kiwi Income Property first-half pretax earnings fall 16 percent
Wellington's commercial property market to remain subdued: KIP
Kiwi Income Property Trust
Write-downs hurt Kiwi Income Property Trust but 1H distributable profit rose 9.1%