Sharechat Logo

Vela Fishing gets off $2m tax bill

By Mike Ross

Friday 6th October 2000

Text too small?
A $2 million dollar tax bill issued to Hamilton fishing company Vela Fishing has been invalidated after a High Court test case on waivers.

Vela Fishing is owned by brothers Peter and Philip Vela, estimated to be worth $50 million on The National Business Review Rich List.

The court ruled there is no legal basis for taxpayer waivers delivered to Inland Revenue in the two years up to November 1998.

In its 1991 tax return, Vela Fishing declared a tax loss of $154,000.

Inland Revenue later disallowed a deduction claimed in relation to a performance bond.

This increased the company's taxable income by $6.2 million, creating a $2 million tax bill.

The reassessment was made outside time limits for issuing amended assessments.

Generally, a statutory time bar prevents the IRD making reassessments more than four years from the end of the income year in which the return was filed.

The High Court was told Vela Fishing signed a time bar waiver in March 1998, days before the time bar kicked in, agreeing to accept reassessments outside the four-year limit.

Vela Fishing agreed to the waiver because of delays on its part in providing information requested by Inland Revenue.

In the High Court, Justice Peter Penlington ruled waiver provisions in the Income Tax Act 1976 did not neatly overlap into the Income Tax Act 1994 and the Tax Administration Act 1994 when tax law was rewritten.

As a result, there was no legal authority for time bar waivers signed between October 1996 and November 1998.

Because the waiver signed by Vela Fishing had no legal effect, the increased tax assessment was out of time and invalid.

Vela Fishing is one of several ventures owned by the Vela brothers, who are also active in the bloodstock world.

  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

WCO - Acquisition of Civic Waste, Convertible Note & SPP
ATM - FY25 revenue guidance and dividend policy
November 22th Morning Report
General Capital Announces Another Profit Record
Infratil Considers Infrastructure Bond Offer
Argosy FY25 Interim Result
Meridian Energy monthly operating report for October 2024
Du Val failure offers fresh lessons, but will they be heeded in the long term?
November 19th Morning Report
ATM - Appointment of new independent NED