Forum Archive Index - June 2004

[Phyllis Bergquist <phyl@clear.net.nz>]

Lazy Haggis,

If we were to examine and take on board the wisdom of each contributor on sharechat and comment

thus we open ourselves to a great deal of of broader knowledge.

 

I am far from being an expert and I trundle along taking on a bit more with every thing I read.

I develop slowly.

 

Phaedrus uses a method which puts an entry at a certain point.    This certain point could be

for a short term trade or a long term trade and is a sccessful method.    Same exit points.

My disciplines improve and I am exploring gently another area which should reveal some

confirmation.    A walk in the path of Woody whom I miss here very much.

 

I reckon you are confident and successful and use a different path.    Congratulations.

And I am will closely watch the path of PNA.    You know a great deal about it.

Thank you very much

 

Phyllis.

----- Original Message -----

From: "Lazy Haggis" <lazyhaggis@hotmail.com>

To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz>

Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 5:12 AM

Subject: [sharechat] Phaedrus - Classic Hogwash

> Re: [sharechat] PNA looking good?
> 
> Phaedrus Wisdom 
>>> " I was loath to draw any conclusions. Your questions 
> are 
simply red herrings, designed to draw discussion away from your false 
> 
claims." <<<
> 
> Phaedrus, unfortunately you did draw 
conclusions (see above based on your 
> chart) and your reply clearly 
shows that you are loathe to answer my 
> questions, not because they are 
red herrings, but simply because they expose 
> the limitations of your 
analysis. The rest of your comments are waffle, 
> because I did not raise 
any specific technical view, yet your very 
> questionable response 
includes a specific technical view (your chart) which 
> you deliberately 
chose in order to draw erroneous conclusions as though I 
> had presented 
that chart myself. Shame on you Phaedrus, that's disgraceful.
> 
> 
If you had submitted that same reply to my scenario "PNA looking good" at 
> high school level as an effective response, you would unlikely have 
received 
> more than 3 out of 10, and you know that only too well. It was 
a very poorly 
> thought out effort, and you are quite capable of much 
better analysis than 
> that. I have seen your past efforts.
> 
> The reason you did not answer my questions were obvious. Depending on 
the 
> various technical time slices chosen, there are different outcomes, 
> typically uptrend or downtrend. It is also possible to have conflicting 
> trends based on the type of technical analysis used. You selected your 
> particular timeframe and chart analysis type because it conveniently 
served 
> the purpose of concluding with your erroneous findings. Had you 
wished to 
> conclude an uptrend result, you could have done so quite 
easily, and on 
> increasing volume - you know that.
> 
> You 
surprise me Phaedrus. Look closer at the volumes. Over the period 
> 
encompassing the most recent internal turning points (MACD and RSI) as the 
> price rose from 15.5 cents through 17 cents the volume increased. You 
and 
> your findings are totally incorrect. Furthermore, your reply and 
comments 
> are red herrings deliberately designed to deceive those who 
are not 
> technically minded, and typically used as a smokescreen from 
idiots who 
> self-appoint themselves to pedestals.
> 
> To 
make matters worse Phaedrus, not only did you concoct an irrelevant 
> 
technical view, you also totally ignored references to the US dollar chart, 
> gold bullion chart, fundamental analysis, and the effect of other 
external 
> factors such as terrorism, all of which effectively combine to 
produce the 
> PNA technical view today - a classic buy.
> 
> 
I am not prepared to enter any further debate on this matter with you, as my 
> point has been clearly made, and anyone can look over those time 
periods at 
> will, however if you feel better within yourself, then 
please feel free to 
> post whatever you wish. I'm sure there will be 
plenty of people who believe 
> your simplistic technical nonsense. Don't 
annoy me again with such trivia.
> 
> Lazy Haggis
> The Mumbo 
Jumbo Filter
> 
> 
_________________________________________________________________
> Watch 
LIVE baseball games on your computer with MLB.TV, included with MSN 
> 
Premium! http://join.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200439ave/direct/01/
> 
> 
> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
> http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
> 
>