| 
 Hi David, 
  
Could be. You would need to look through all 
ASX announcements to locate that info. 
  
Regards, 
Cris 
  ----- Original Message -----  
  
  
  Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 1:12 
PM 
  Subject: Re: Re: [sharechat] RE: MUL and 
  other technology stocks 
  
  guess one thing i would like to know is who the major 
  shareholders are? Is the "smart money in this stock" ie:microcap 
  investment funds,the old melb money 
  etc??
  ============================================================ From: 
  "Cristine Kerr" <criskerr@optusnet.com.au> Date: 
  2004/04/02 Fri PM 03:08:31 GMT+12:00 To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> Subject: 
  Re: [sharechat] RE: MUL and other technology stocks
  Karyn,
  I 
  only had a quick look at one of the stocks you mentioned. 
  TNE - 
  TECHNOLOGY ONE LIMITED
  2.2.04 - CBA on 28.1.04 DISPOSED - 33748804 
  down to 28199006
  8.3.04 - CBA on 3.3.04 DISPOSED - 28,199,006 to 
  25,230,267 (8.45%) 15.3.04  - Ronald McLean (Director) on 12.3.04 
  DISPOSED  - 400,000 shares for $240,000 - NOTE: NUMBER HELD AFTER CHANGE 
  - ZERO
  Is this your best argument for everyone to listen to your 
  doomsday advice and stock recommendations?
  Have a great 
  day, Cris
    ----- Original Message -----    From: Karyn 
  W    To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz    Sent: Friday, April 02, 
  2004 12:30 PM   Subject: [sharechat] RE: MUL and other technology 
  stocks
 
    Hi   What MUL do is buy bandwidth from a 
  satellilte owner, and onsell it in    various guises with a margin to 
  customers.  They do not do anything    different from any other 
  telco or ISP, it is only the technology that is    different.  If 
  you rang Telstra, Optus and AAPT they will all be able to    sell you 
  the exact same service that MUL provides.   However, whether you are a 
  reseller of fibre, ATM, xDSL, copper, cable, 3G,    or satellite 
  bandwidth, the business model is the same, the competitive    issues 
  are similar, the services delivered over the bandwidth identical.  
     The choice of delivery mechanism of these IP services depends on 
     availability, price, and suitability for the service.  The 
  market for    satellite bandwidth is actually a niche one - as 
  landline access is now    pretty ubiquitous, and where it is not, 
  mobile providers are moving in (eg.    Africa, Iraq)
    All 
  major telcos and many ISPs use satellite bandwidth in some form or    
  another, as it used to be a lot cheaper than buying fibre (up until the big 
     cables like Southern Cross came online, then the price differential 
  went the    other way).  Nowadays the most common reason to stick 
  with using satellite    is to provide an alternative redundant path to 
  the land-based cables, ie. in    the event of Southern Cross or its 
  ilk being damaged, the Internet traffic    can be routed via 
  satellite.  This is one reason why Defence services like    it - 
  it is less vulnerable to physical interference than land-based    
  transmission mechanisms.
    Ihug (part of iiNet) in NZ and 
  Australia has been offering satellite    services since around 1996 - 
  http://www.ihug.com.au/getultra/satellite.html    - both at a consumer 
  and wholesale ISP level.  However, its limitations    (such as 
  rain fade) have meant that it is not preferable to a land-based    
  technology, and therefore never really took off.
    I've worked for 
  telcos/ISP's since 1995, so I'd like to warn people to not    be 
  snowed by the profilic use of technology terms, the steady stream of 
     press releases, announcements of "big contracts", etc because I've 
  seen it    all before, and I know that the reality is that they dont 
  mean anything! The    fact that they have to announce these things at 
  all (when every other    telco/ISP treats similar deals as business as 
  usual) just signals how    desperate they are to con the uninformed 
  and technology illiterate public.
    (For the record, I also have 
  issues with the bullshit that SKG announce on a    regular basis for 
  the same reasons - most of the stuff is so passe now that    their 
  "deals" are simply copying what other providers have already been    
  doing for several years now.  For instance, I was discussing wireless 
     broadband global roaming with iPass back in 2001!)
    
  MUL is a small company, operating in a global market, with no competitive 
     advantage, subject to intense competitive pressures due to 
  oversupply, a    market dominated by large telcos with very deep 
  pockets, and with new    entrants (eg. 3G providers) set to erode 
  their market niche.   That is not    to say that they are a 
  bad company - they may be around forever, they may    make profits and 
  even provide a good return on capital, but the fact is is    that in 
  this industry things change so quickly that crystal ball gazing is    
  damn near impossible - after all, a few years ago we were all certain that 
     grocery shopping and buying pet food online was going to be huge 
  too!
    I am a cynic - if I saw a run of "big" announcements 
  followed by a director    selling out, then I'd be doing the 
  same!
    I think David said it best ("Lets party like its 1999), 
  and add that "those    who do not learn from  history are 
  condemned to repeat it".
    Now on an upside - if you do want some 
  decent tech stocks to invest in, then    take a look at TNE, VGL, DTL 
  on the ASX (all pay a 5%-7% dividend) and RNS,    PVO on the 
  NZX.  I prefer to "invest" in tech, not "speculate" - as I learnt 
     my lesson in the 90's and will not repeat it :-(
    
  Karyn
    
  _________________________________________________________________   
  Get Extra Storage in 10MB, 25MB, 50MB and 100MB options now! Go to  
     
  http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-au&page=hotmail/es2
 
    
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------   
  To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at   
  http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
  ============================================================
 
  David 
  Maire National Sales Manager Navman Wireless 
  Australasia +61416066583 
  
    
  
  
  
  Karyn, 
    
  I only had a quick look at one of the stocks you 
  mentioned.  
    
  TNE - TECHNOLOGY ONE LIMITED 
    
  2.2.04 - CBA on 28.1.04 DISPOSED 
  - 33748804 down to 28199006 
    
  8.3.04 - CBA on 3.3.04 DISPOSED 
  - 28,199,006 to 25,230,267 (8.45%) 
  15.3.04  - Ronald McLean (Director) on 
  12.3.04 DISPOSED  
  - 400,000 shares for $240,000 
  - NOTE: NUMBER HELD AFTER CHANGE - 
  ZERO 
    
  Is this your best argument for everyone to listen 
  to your doomsday advice and stock recommendations? 
    
  Have a great day, 
  Cris 
    
  
    ----- Original Message -----  
    
    
    Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 12:30 
    PM 
    Subject: [sharechat] RE: MUL and other 
    technology stocks 
    
  Hi What MUL do is buy bandwidth from a satellilte owner, 
    and onsell it in  various guises with a margin to customers.  They 
    do not do anything  different from any other telco or ISP, it is only the 
    technology that is  different.  If you rang Telstra, Optus and AAPT 
    they will all be able to  sell you the exact same service that MUL 
    provides. However, whether you are a reseller of fibre, ATM, xDSL, 
    copper, cable, 3G,  or satellite bandwidth, the business model is the 
    same, the competitive  issues are similar, the services delivered over 
    the bandwidth identical.   The choice of delivery mechanism of these 
    IP services depends on  availability, price, and suitability for the 
    service.  The market for  satellite bandwidth is actually a niche 
    one - as landline access is now  pretty ubiquitous, and where it is not, 
    mobile providers are moving in (eg.  Africa, Iraq)
  All major 
    telcos and many ISPs use satellite bandwidth in some form or  another, as 
    it used to be a lot cheaper than buying fibre (up until the big  cables 
    like Southern Cross came online, then the price differential went the 
     other way).  Nowadays the most common reason to stick with using 
    satellite  is to provide an alternative redundant path to the land-based 
    cables, ie. in  the event of Southern Cross or its ilk being damaged, the 
    Internet traffic  can be routed via satellite.  This is one reason 
    why Defence services like  it - it is less vulnerable to physical 
    interference than land-based  transmission mechanisms.
  Ihug (part 
    of iiNet) in NZ and Australia has been offering satellite  services since 
    around 1996 - http://www.ihug.com.au/getultra/satellite.html 
     - both at a consumer and wholesale ISP level.  However, its 
    limitations  (such as rain fade) have meant that it is not preferable to 
    a land-based  technology, and therefore never really took 
    off.
  I've worked for telcos/ISP's since 1995, so I'd like to warn 
    people to not  be snowed by the profilic use of technology terms, the 
    steady stream of  press releases, announcements of "big contracts", etc 
    because I've seen it  all before, and I know that the reality is that 
    they dont mean anything! The  fact that they have to announce these 
    things at all (when every other  telco/ISP treats similar deals as 
    business as usual) just signals how  desperate they are to con the 
    uninformed and technology illiterate public.
  (For the record, I also 
    have issues with the bullshit that SKG announce on a  regular basis for 
    the same reasons - most of the stuff is so passe now that  their "deals" 
    are simply copying what other providers have already been  doing for 
    several years now.  For instance, I was discussing wireless 
     broadband global roaming with iPass back in 2001!)
  MUL is a small 
    company, operating in a global market, with no competitive  advantage, 
    subject to intense competitive pressures due to oversupply, a  market 
    dominated by large telcos with very deep pockets, and with new  entrants 
    (eg. 3G providers) set to erode their market niche.   That is not 
     to say that they are a bad company - they may be around forever, they 
    may  make profits and even provide a good return on capital, but the fact 
    is is  that in this industry things change so quickly that crystal ball 
    gazing is  damn near impossible - after all, a few years ago we were all 
    certain that  grocery shopping and buying pet food online was going to be 
    huge too!
  I am a cynic - if I saw a run of "big" announcements 
    followed by a director  selling out, then I'd be doing the same!
  I 
    think David said it best ("Lets party like its 1999), and add that "those 
     who do not learn from  history are condemned to repeat 
    it".
  Now on an upside - if you do want some decent tech stocks to 
    invest in, then  take a look at TNE, VGL, DTL on the ASX (all pay a 5%-7% 
    dividend) and RNS,  PVO on the NZX.  I prefer to "invest" in tech, 
    not "speculate" - as I learnt  my lesson in the 90's and will not repeat 
    it 
    :-(
  Karyn
  _________________________________________________________________ Get 
    Extra Storage in 10MB, 25MB, 50MB and 100MB options now! Go to   http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-au&page=hotmail/es2
 
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To 
    remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
  
  
    
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To 
  remove yourself from this list, please use the form 
  at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/ 
 |