|
Printable version |
From: | "David & Jill Stevenson" <djstevo@quicksilver.net.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:01:58 +1300 |
Allan,
(1)
Jewish Zionist
(2)
Christian Zionist
(3)
Christian Coalition
(4)
Armaments Industry
(5)
Pentagon
Not
necessarily in that order of influence . Because there are so many strings
attached to this marionette it is difficult to read predictability into his
actions.
Don`t
get me wrong I am no conspiracy theorist nor have I any barrow to push. I simply
do not like to see disproportionate influences bringing pressure to bear to
influence world events in a world of diverse viewpoints and positions.I am
neither Hawk nor Dove on Iraq . Saddam had to go . Centuries old European
diplomacy is preferable to blatant unilateral decisions of a crusading President
. Compare the Israeli softly softly approach at Entebbe.
It is
interesting to examine leadership . The NZ Prime Minister a couple of years ago
was a somewhat harsh caricature of a Head of State. Today she appears before us
on TV as a perhaps engaging ,articulate leader. What effected the transition.
Hours of Eliza Dolittle make over . Brian Edwards would have provided all
the artificial cues of deportment and techniques of profile exposure ,lighting
awareness . Advisers would have trained her in aspects of avoiding the issue and
sophistry . Speech therapists would have introduced a softer voice
inflection . PR specialists too would have made major contribution to
reconstruct the raw material they were confronted with.
In the case of Bush
similar behind the scenes specialists would have attempted major reconstruction
. At the end we the public might reasonably ask" 'Would the real
Helen Clark and George Bush please present themselves " Even their own mother`s
would question the nature of reality.
Regards
David Stevenson
|
Replies
|