|
Printable version |
From: | "Gavin Treadgold" <gav@rediguana.co.nz> |
Date: | Sat, 3 Jan 2004 17:51:04 +1300 |
Hi
Macdunk.
Just a
couple of points I'd like to address.
1. The
incubation period. The UK authorities implemented an Over Thirty Month rule that
now cattle over 30 months old could be processed for human consumption (http://www.foodstandards.gov.uk/foodindustry/meat/otmreview/).
They are currently reviewing it, and it seems they want to remove this
rule, and replace it with the requirement that OTM cattle are tested before
slaughter. This suggests that they feel confident that they can sell OTM
cattle for consumption to humans. Not perfect, but it seems to indicate that
they have some confidence in the timeframes involved.
2. The link
to dairy herds may be different than you suggest. It may have been that dairy
herds were fed differently from other cattle, and that it was brain/spinal
material in their food that caused the BSE. I wouldn't of course rule out
transmission from mother to calf - talking to my flatmate who has worked in food
safety, she said that milk doesn't contain plasma, and there should be no
problem with treated milk for humans - as Woody suggests. However, if the calf
displays some irrational exuberence and injures the teet, it may cause
blood and hence plasma to transfer from the mother to the calf. Not to mention
transfer via the umbilical cord for unborn calves.
But what you
propose is good, Macdunk. For once, geographical isolation could work in our
favour and allow us to produce premium product. Clean and green would be very
easy to leverage upon from our tourism marketing too.
The biggest
issues we'd face with going down this path are: -
*
increased compliance from farmers to remain BSE free (increased
expenses)
*
increased border security requirements (who pays?)
*
greater risk of losses from anything that degrades our clean and green image -
such as increased industry, or accidental/intentional release of
organisms
Cheers
Gav
|
Replies
References
|