Forum Archive Index - October 2003
Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.
Re: [sharechat] Woody Reply Snoopy
Title:
Hi Woody
>
> Snoopy you are
TOO pedantic. Relax a bit go withthe flow. I lack the
> Knowledge of
English to combat you with this language. In Dutch,Malay
> or Indonesian
I can better explain. to ME to go beyong FA would take
> me hours and
hours because I could also elaborate on TA, There are
> Chartists, Pure
Cycle Traders, There are Luna Cycle Traders,
> Astrological
Traders,
>
Sorry Woody, your English is so good
sometimes I forget that it is not
your natural language!
The fact that not all F/A people use a system
that is exactly the same should not be difficult for you to understand
though.
> > >
> > > You
have Price: Which is both a Fundamental and Technical Issue
> > > You
have Time: Which is only a Technical Issue You have Support
> > > and
Resistance. You have Cycles.
> > >
> > > Price
is what the Market is willing to Pay: Now all the FA traders
> > > do
their research come to a conclusion and from this they
> > > formulate
a Price, a value for the Market. The Buyers wont pay
> > > more
and Sellers wont accept less. Now this creates a memory in
> > > the
Market.
> > >This
memory is called Support and Resistance.
> > >TA traders
read this message and
> > > formulate
from their charts that the Max Price for the Market is
> > > $x.00
and the Min Price is $y.00. So they note the Support and
> > > Resistance
lines on their charts. Now every time a price moves
> > > near
a Resistance line both old and new. The Buyers hesitate the
> > > FA
traders hesitate because their value indicators say DO not pay
> > > any
more for this Market. The TA traders do not need to say that
> > > they
just watch their lines and they know that the Market will
> > > hesitate
at the line or even stop. Now if the Majority of the FA
> > > traders
decide that THIS is the Price then they will not pay
> > > anymore,
so the Market stops. They TA traders are already prepared
> > > for
this and place their stops there or Exit the Market. Now the
> > > FA
sellers use their value indicators to tell them that this is a
> > > good
place to sell, WE HAVE SOLD HERE BEFORE.
> > >( Hence
a Cycle )
> > >
> >
> > You were
going well, but I think your logic just derailed.
>
> PLEASE TO TELL
WHICH ONE IS DERAILED!!!!!
>
You said that a T/A person will always
get out before an F/A person. I
disagree.
>
> WAKE UP SNOOPY
I HAVE NEITHER THE SPACE NOR THE
> TIME TO TO SPEAK
> ANYTHING ELSE
BUT GENERALLY!!!!!
>
OK I'll be more direct.
Your belief that all trading systems work on
fixed support and resistance lines is wrong. This is no criticisim of
your system. I am just pointing out that others do it differently.
>
>SINCE OUR COMPANY
MAKE AN EXCELLENT PROFIT AND WE
HAVE APPLIED FOR AND
>WILL RECIEVE AND
A SECURITIES LICENCE TO OPERATE A
HEDGE FUND IN THE
>NEAR FUTURE I
FAIL TO SEE THE DISADVANTAGE OF MY
SYSTEM.
>
There may not be any disadvantage.
Perhaps in the markets you
trade your system works perfectly for you. I merely point out that if
you take your system to another market you might find another trading
system is better.
>
> Think of
> buying an antique
clock as an analogous example. I buy a clock
> for $2000 and
stick it on my mantlepiece. In two years time I offer
> to sell it to
you for $2100. Do you buy it from me or not? I
> guess the first
thing you would do is go and visit the antique shops
> and see what
similar clocks are selling for. Let's say most were
> priced
around $2200. So the facts are clock prices are on an
> uptrend and
you have a chance to buy one at less than market price.
> So
do you buy it from me? I will be interested in your answer!
>
>
>MY ANSWER IS SIMPLE
I WILL PAY YOU WHAT EVER THE
CLOCK
>IS WORTH TO ME.
>
>IF IT IS ' NEUCHATEL
GRANDE SONNEIE ' I WOULD PAY YOU A
>FORTUNE
>
>IF IT WAS A PENDULE
NEUCHATALOISE I WOULD PAY ONLY
>$2000.
>
>HOWEVER IF IT
WAS A PENDULE NEUCHATALOISE LOUIS XV
>THEN MAN I WOULD PAY YOU $1000'SSSS
>
Well, the clock is a 'PENDULE
NEUCHATALOISE' so your answer is
that you will pay me $2,000. Very good, as you got it for less than the
market price of $2,200, so you got a bargain. Or did you?
You made one mistake in buying this
clock from me. You were so
busy trying to figure out what kind of clock it was that, you did not look
closely at my particular clock.
Before you get angry, let me make
it clear that I was not trying to rob
you. The clock you have just bought from me goes perfectly and looks
very fine, as good as the day it came out of the craftsman's hands who
made it. But inside the clock I have made changes. I have pulled out
the mechanical movement and put in a battery motor - made in China!
The clock still appears the same, but I have destroyed the value of it
by making this alteration. It is now worth only $150!
Now what has all this got to do with
the subject we talk about?
Imagine the 'clock' is now a 'stock'.
You use the market to determine
that it has a value of $2000 to you. $2000 is below the market support
level (the price the the antique dealer catalogue in the clock analogy)
so you know you have bought it at a good price. But you did not do
any F/A on this clock/stock. You did not look beyond the price to
see what you were buying. You thought that the clock/stock was the
*same clock* that I had bought two years earlier. But it wasn't. The
clock/stock *looked* the same at a casual glance. The clock/stock
was priced the same. So you assumed the clock/stock *was* the
same. But you were wrong. You did not look carefully enough. You
did not do your F/A and did not notice that inside the clock was greatly
changed!
The stock price was $2,000 two years
ago. The stock price is now
$2,000 again. It has just bounced off the support line so now is a
good time to buy the stock. Do you see the problem with this
'support line' theory? You assume it is the *same* stock as it was
two years ago. But underlying businesses can change and keep the
same label. You might be wrong!
SNOOPY
--
Message sent by Snoopy
on Pegasus Mail version 4.02
----------------------------------
"You can tell me I'm wrong twice,
but that still only makes me wrong
once."
References