|
Printable version |
From: | "Dave Missen" <d.tackle@xtra.co.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:56:21 +1200 |
Terry
The short answer is yes.
Have seen small stands of native trees used where small
pockets of land are being retired. The quantity overall is
insignificant. Time to grow exceeds one normal human lifespan (depending
on species and environment) so often not considered as a cash
crop.
There have been other attempts to break out of the
monoculture of pinus radiata (eucalyptus, Douglas fir, acacia) but these have
either been on small scale or have not proved ideal to specific environment they
were grown in.
The biggest pity is that there are native trees dying (or
blown over in climatic events etc) in native bush that are left
unharvested. Perhaps an example of excess zeal by conservation lobby
groups making it all but impossible to harvest this valuable resource under
current RMA rules. It is possible to harvest (selective logging??) this
timber using heavy-lift helicopters with out leaving a disaster area behind
however the Greens in particular would rather see them left to rot so that the
natural (inclusive of decay) can be allowed to occur.
The have been a few prospectuses for non-native hardwood
forestry blocks floating around in recent years. It appears these
companies are focused on niche off-shore markets for hardwood
chips/pulp.
Dave
|
References
|