|
Printable version |
From: | "David Morgan" <davidmorgan@paradise.net.nz> |
Date: | Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:25:11 +1200 |
----- Original Message ----- From: "david.gibson" <david.gibson@k.co.nz> To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:36 PM Subject: RE: [sharechat] Trans Tasman Properties (TTP) > I am aware that GPG have considered Trans Tasman "in play" since the > conversion of the convertable notes to shares. GPG also has a significant > investment in AGH. > > While I cannot consider the interest/involvement of GPG to be wholy positive > ... I do not consider the involvement of SEA to be completely negative. My > understanding of management fees is that AGH contract with SEA for property > management in Australia. These fees are benchmarked at the approximate cost > of performing management "in house". The NZ operations rely on "in house" > management. I do not know where the perception that SEA or Directors are > "creaming" the profits comes from ... I would appreciate any information on > this ;) > > My research into the "Property Trust" sector in NZ leads me to believe that > other listed property organisations have management company fee structures > that are significantly worse than the TTP benchmark. Again, I would > appreciate comment and information. > > Overall, I think SEA are a significant asset to TTP. The company has been > able to commit to long term restructuring because of the support of the > foundation shareholder. The RJI Trans Tasman and SEABIL really "fell > together" rather than separately "falling over" in 1995 - the balance sheet > was quite shocking at this point - and has progressively improved. > > Today, I think the shareprice discount is anomalous. However, I am keenly > interested in other opinions and pertinant facts!! > > In terms of the reallocation of the sale proceeds of the AGH property: > > 1) AGH will have lost critical mass - they either need to reinvest or > dissolve. > 2) They have an experienced Australian based Board - my guess is they will > find some investment/development opportunities. > 3) There is scope for further restructuring of the TTP parent - my guess is > payback of the expensive secured bonds. > 4) Rather than a cash special dividend, for TTP shareholders, there is > significant opportunity for a share buy back on the NZ market to improve the > NTA. > > By the end of the year, I expect: > > 1) Resumption of the dividend to about $0.04 per share from operational > cash flows > 2) A share price in the $0.40 - $0.45 range > 3) An end to the downward property revaluations > > Of course this is personal speculation - but it is based on a close look at > the balance sheet and keen interest in the companies recent "events". I > would appreciate comments or critiques of this "straw man" argument. > > Unfortunately the stock does not attract any coverage from Analysts or > insightful Journalists. > > Thanks to Marilyn for the market insight :) > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|