Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - May 2003

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] investing in building disasters by macdunk


From: "tonysw" <tonysw@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 09:16:32 +1200


Robin
You refer to 'master builder'.........I did not realise that you can become a 'master builder' without any qualifications.....but I better not go there.
KTm
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, 6 May 2003 21:33 p.m.
Subject: Re: [sharechat] investing in building disasters by macdunk

Actually, I would have to say that building in New Zealand suffers and benefits as much from the Kiwi "character" as anything else. The ephemeral perspective of pioneer psyche remains ingrained in Kiwi thinking. Contrast with the UK, where a lot of building is fundamentally solid (let's not talk about interiors or finish, ok?) in terms of structure and integrity, but has a look that would drive Rodney Dangerfield to suicide.

In general (of course there are exceptions, and times, they are a changin'), quality, or endurance are not sought-after attributes of housing, or anything really, in NZ. People will save a buck here and there, get a mate to do this and that even though it might not be perfect, skimp on the fundamentals and spend money on fashion. If you want something to look like a Spanish villa, you'd better figure out why it's built that way and uses the materials it does, before thinking that it will survive in your particular climate. And because NZ has so many climates, what works in Auckland might be a disaster in Queenstown.

The fencing-wire mentality has a lot to answer for. "She'll be right" becomes a badge of honor amongst people who can't be bothered finding out how to do things properly.

However, if all you want to pay for is a "master" builder, or a mate from down the road, then you'll get what you pay for ... unless you've got MacDunk for a mate, as then you'll be able to kick back and enjoy a solid, long-lasting non-leaky house :O)

Cheers

Robin
(B.Arch)

On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 02:54 Europe/London, Duncan MacGregor wrote:

The people that buy property as an investment or even as a roof over there head most of them in my experience it is the blind leading the blind. NZ building codes at the moment are going from bad to straight out stupid.  We will have a great shake up only after thousands of more innocent people find out there house is only good enough for a match. How to rectify it is simple.   All materials and regulations get back dated to 1983 any new systems from that date or new materials to be proven tested before allowing its use.    The problem is the people setting the rules don't under stand the basic principals of construction.   EX a plaster type wall over a timber frame is a complete disaster regardless of who the builder is.  The basic reason is it is supposed to be water tight that means air tight.  The air pressure outside the wall is greater than the pressure inside, and that wall will even suck water uphill.  Add to the fact the down pipes are screwed with clips through this shell and there is the first leak.   Timber must breathe was the first thing I was taught as an apprentice.    They choke the wall up with insulation like it was the artic circle when in actual fact most of the heat is lost through the windows double glazing is more sensible.  The real disaster comes with the sealant breakdown Its only good for  ten years max, and all it takes is a pin hole for water to be sucked in to rot untreated timber.    Dry and wet rot plus other fungus health hazards take over after that.
What to do about it is simple if you own what I have described, sell it before it happens because it will before to long. Simple rules to follow brick veneer is best followed by weatherboards after that it is dangerous territory
There is going to be lots of finger pointing, so share holders beware it will hit the fan in a big way.
 I predicted this in 1990 and refused to build eggshell buildings much to the disgust of would be clients who thought and even told me to get real and move with the times.  Building inspectors were the worst almost demanding that I change and use untreated wood.   Who is most to blame.  I would point the first finger at the master builders who are dumb enough to allow it to happen in the first place, lets face it If they didnt know better than that, and try to stop it like myself and a few other builders I know then what good are they and why have them.
           CHEERS MACDUNK    

References

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] investing in building disasters by macdunk philip
Previous by Date: [sharechat] Re: Investing / speculating in biotechs Jerry&sam ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: Re: [sharechat] investing in building disasters by macdunk DR
Previous by Thread: Re: [sharechat] investing in building disasters by macdunk Robin Benson ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]