|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Sat, 7 Dec 2002 23:15:14 +0000 |
Hi Hans, > > >Likewise NZ Steel at Glenbrook. If it was marginal with >cheap energy, what will it be like with higher costs >amid a worldwide glut of steel production capability? > > To partly answer your question: "Ironsands and coal are the main raw materials used in the steelmaking process, both of which are sourced locally. Coal is transported by rail approximately 50km from a mine owned by the New Zealand Government. New Zealand Steel's single largest non labour cost is electricity, approximately 60% of which is generated onsite through a cogeneration plant plant owned by Duke energy." source p46 Scheme Booklet, 'Scheme of arrangement and reduction of capitalin relation to the demerger of BHP Steel Limited', as published by BHP Billiton, May 2002. In other words coal generates 60% of the NZ Steel plants electricity as a by product of the heating process used in production. So it will be significantly insulated from external electricity price rises. SNOOPY --------------------------------- Message sent by Snoopy e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 ---------------------------------- "Sometimes to see the wood from the trees, you have to cut down all the trees." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
References
|