|
Printable version |
From: | "Gordon King" <gordon.k@xtra.co.nz> |
Date: | Tue, 4 Jun 2002 13:27:59 +1200 |
Don't forget that you are also in the physical market. What you lose (or gain) on the hedge you'll even out in the physical market. Company hedging isn't about speculation, its about securing a known currency rate for a future transaction. Gordon -----Original Message----- From: sharechat-owner@sharechat.co.nz [mailto:sharechat-owner@sharechat.co.nz] On Behalf Of tennyson@caverock.net.nz Sent: Wednesday, 5 June 2002 12:20 a.m. To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz Subject: Re: [sharechat] NZ Companies and Hedging Hi trader 100, > > >I take your point about the 'risk' of a hedge being out of the money. >Although from a finance point of view I believe that the correct way to >look at a forward contract is to say that it has removed the risk but, >as with any decision, there is an opportunity cost. > > Interestingly enough, I happened to hear financial commentator Murray Weatherstone's interview on National radio this morning where he was discussing exactly this topic. The bit I hadn't appreciated before was that the rate set in a hedge contract is not a prediction of where the exchange rate will go. It is just a balancing out of the interest rate risk, as you have explained to us 'trader 100'. Weatherston also said that often the bank drawing up the exchange rate hedge asks for a 'deposit' on the future transaction, sometimes as high as 20% of the capital to be spent in one years time! This seems outrageous. It still seems odd to me that a New Zealand company would seek to mitigate their exchange rate risk by taking out a 'policy' which makes no pretence at guessing where the exchange rate is going! Because of this, I find it hard to come to terms with the idea that the New Zealand company is 'out of the money' if the exchange rate 'goes the other way'. I feel 'out in left field' would be a more apt description of such an event. I guess the main niggle I still have is that as an importer you want to make sure the $NZ doesn't go below a certain price. As an exporter you want to make sure the $NZ doesn't go above a certain price. Hedging is not really a protection against this, because it is not guaranteed that the hedging price you will be offered will meet these goals. I wonder at the opportunity cost of taking out a 'policy' that doesn't really cover the event you are trying to insure against. Hedging seems to be a take it or leave it bet. I was under the impression that *if* the exchange rate you were offered as a hedge did not meet your goal, then you would at least have the option of paying a higher premium so that it would. Granted the higher premium might have been so high as to make the transaction marginal for you. Nevertheless I was under the impression you had that choice, yet it seems very clear from what you are saying 'trader 100' that as a exporter/importer, you don't. SNOOPY --------------------------------- Message sent by Snoopy e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 ---------------------------------- "You can tell me I'm wrong twice, but that still only makes me wrong once." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
References
|