Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - May 2002

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] hugh webber


From: hugh webber <hugh.webber@clear.net.nz>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 17:46:18 +1200


Actually Jim, you need to take it in the context but unless
you have been around Sharechat for a couple of years and
know the RIL posts you wouldn't appreciate it. I suggest 
you read back on the RIL posts for a couple of years.
Don't post on what you don't know.

On the face of it your post transgresses the Sharechat rules
(a) its personal
(b) use of emotive language.

Nuff said. The subject or Sharechat is shares not individual 
people. If there is a problem Ben Dutton & will sort it out as
they have several times in the past. 
Lets get on with the actual shares.


----------
From: Jim Insley <jinsley@paradise.net.nz>
To: Sharechat <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz>
Subject: [sharechat] hugh webber
Date: Tuesday, 14 May 2002 13:01


3. There's always someone dumb enuff, its like sweeping
water uphill trying to educate Sharechat. Some will never
learn and there's a constant flood of newbies who don't know
how to use the search function.
This arrogant rudeness will probably scare off the "newbies",leaving sharechat 
inhabited solely by
self-proclaimed experts.      Not including Snoopy,Phaedrus et al who have 
demonstrated their
thoughtfulness.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/


 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] QTL / AMM / BNO andrew cottingham
Previous by Date: Re: [sharechat] PTD release nickk ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: [sharechat] hugh webber Jim Insley
Previous by Thread: [sharechat] hugh webber Jim Insley ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]