|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Fri, 22 Feb 2002 23:14:04 +0000 |
Hi DR, > > >in reply to the original post. >1. For equality any tax on wealth -usually capital gains in other >countries is only levied on sale of the asset. To maintain equality, >that has to be true in NZ as well. > > I am sorry to inform you that the proposal is to tax assets (in particular listed shares and bonds) as they are held *not* when they are sold. As such I believe that all of my criticisims of such a scheme remain valid. The most unpopular aspect of this tax (the idea of taxing own your own homes) has been discarded. However, it is very clear that Cullen proposes to tax shares based on their market value on some arbitrary balance date. I believe the Netherlands already has such a system in place. So it has been done in Zealand. And it will now be done in New Zealand too. SNOOPY --------------------------------- Message sent by Snoopy e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 ---------------------------------- "Q: If you call a dog tail a leg, how many legs does a dog have?" "A: Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
References
|