|
Printable version |
From: | "winner69 ." <wwinner69@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:23:51 +0000 |
Besides our friend Mary (Holm that is) having cheques cleared by the bank before she wanted them to Mary was also promoting 'dollar cost averaging' in today's The Herald. The sure fire way to buy stocks/units in her favourite managed fund cheaply she says. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/businessstorydisplay.cfm?storyID=836926&thesection=business&thesubsection=general&thesecondsubsection=&thetickercode= Timing is a funny thing - just the other day I read in Barrons that if anybody had bought into the Nasdaq on a 'dollar cost average' basis from 1997 through 2001 they would have earned less than 1% - a pittance of a gain through one of the biggest bull markets of all time. And I have seen a graph somewhere else that shows if you bought into the S&P500 on the same basis you now need the S&P500 to increase by over 20% to break even. Everybody to their own thing obviously. On the bright side if these people hadn't been putting the fixed amount away each month (or whatever) they most likely would have spent it. At least they have saved something. _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
|