Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - January 2002

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

[sharechat] WAM an interesting example of changing sentiment


From: "nick" <helmett@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 07:55:25 +1300


      Remember a few months ago, WAM was at around 2.50.
Interesting at the time were the differing opinions.  I thought them a buy on instinct ie oversold
Phedorus thought they were a buy when they went into uptrend 2.47?
and Peter gave us a highly detailed fundamental report on why they were only worth
2.20 !
       
   Adding to all this a big fund manager was unloading shares as fast as possible.
General sentiment seemed to be that competition was rising and the loss of the auckland
contract was detrimental.
         Now a few months later what do we find ? Shareprice rising over 3 dollars,
all the brokers picking the stock as one of the years star performers and suddenly
once again WAM are back in favour.
 
      What does this all tell us?  
1. Sentiment changes rapidly
2. Share prices fluctuate for no apparent fundamental reason (company not changed anything)
3. Brokers and fund managers move markets and are fickle creatures
4. Fundamental analysis is not guaranteed to pick prices,  ie peters post
5. T.A ignored all this and bought at a good time
6. Ignore brokers picks,  (probably recommended all those they currently overweight in so further gains unlikely)
 
 Nick
         

Replies

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] WAM an interesting example of changing sentiment andrew cottingham
Previous by Date: Re: Re: [sharechat] MCR.ax andrew cottingham ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: Re: [sharechat] WAM an interesting example of changing sentiment andrew cottingham
Previous by Thread: Re: [sharechat] Data and Charting Software Mike ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]