|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Fri, 14 Sep 2001 23:42:06 +0000 |
Hi Phil, > > Gary may be referring to > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/news/nbr/article.php/a83ab6f7 > which makes mention of this. > > "No significant reduction in the workforce;" "No significant reduction in the regional network, and no loss of regional destinations;" "Ansett retaining substantial Australian headquarters and operational centres" Hmmm, that is quite a restrictive list. So where were those $350m worth of cost savings that ex CEO Jim McRae identified going to come from again? All this still doesn't answer the question below though. > > What do you think the Australian Government should have done? > SNOOPY --------------------------------- Message sent by Snoopy e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 ---------------------------------- "You can tell me I'm wrong twice, but that still only makes me wrong once." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
References
|