|
Printable version |
From: | "G Stolwyk" <stolwyk@wave.co.nz> |
Date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:57:54 +1200 |
Peter,
My post of June 24 mentioned in item
3, that on the basis of RMG having declared an
EBITDA of only $ 1.3 mill.in the first 3 months, that this
could amount to $ 6 mill. for the full
year.
I did'nt say that they will earn
this! In my opinion, it is the best what can be expected!
But even so, if they allowed for a deduction
of only half of the abnormals/intangibles that they ought
to deduct and pay a nominal tax of 0.1 mill, their
notional profit will only be 0.3 cents /
share!
I say " notional ", because we
have not allowed for the deduction of more
goodwill!
In any case, there are a number of reasons why this
target may not be reached:
The new CEO, mr Boult, will
want to put new systems into place and do everything needed to try to set
up the company properly.
He has already mentioned the appointment of
more senior staff and no doubt he will do what needs
to be done. Computer systems will be
looked at very carefully! No doubt, he will be looking at any
overlapping of branches and what can be done about this!
My opinion is, that either all of the costs will be
entered this year or, if that is not acceptable or not possible, the
reorganisation and associated costs will continue in the year following! As
mentioned in previous posts, the money will be tight!
I doubt if there will be any
dividends in either this or the
following year!
He will be
writing down more if he thinks that this
is justified. This time, there won't be any long discussions with the
auditor !
In my opinion, the Board may not be in a
position to refuse anything, he thinks that needs to
be done!
Thus, the sum total of the costs of
reorganisation and the strict adherence to correct accounting,
will most likely lead to a loss, even if:
No tax is paid and the entry of goodwill is a
nominal one.
Therefore, your reference in your post of June 27,
2001 that " my equation of the odds of making profit this year are 33% ", is a
somewhat optimistic one, I feel.
I have already mentioned that I am only interested
in the NPAT data and this needs to include the appropiate
amount of goodwill!
My posts of June 23 and 24, 2001, refers to the 582
mill. shares, RMG has. Of this amount, 264 mill. shares could
be in escrow till June 30, 2002.
This lot is overhanging the market in the
meantime! Then, the next
hurdle is having to pay
tax.
I shall wait with buying RMG till
this situation is clarified. That will take time!
Those are my opinions!
Gerry
|
|